2010
DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-52-s1-s29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of internal parasites in wild boar farms in Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examination of the presence of parasites with regard to animals' gender did not reveal any differences in parasitic fauna between female and male animals ( Table 3). Our results are thus consistent with the reports of other authors (2,3,12,14,18).…”
Section: Discusionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Examination of the presence of parasites with regard to animals' gender did not reveal any differences in parasitic fauna between female and male animals ( Table 3). Our results are thus consistent with the reports of other authors (2,3,12,14,18).…”
Section: Discusionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The prevalence of A. suum infection in suburban wild boars (7.1%) is lower than previously noted among suburban wild boars in Belgrade (9.37%) [29]. A. suum has been found in wild boar in Poland [30], Spain [31], Brazil [24], Russia [18], and Finland [32]. Also, our data indicate that, while A. suum was not present in lighter animals, i.e., under 40 kg, it was found in 21.1% of individuals in the 40-70 kg range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…was detected in wild boar in Estonia (Jaervis et al2008), in Poland (Balicka-Ramisz et al 2000Pilarczyk et al 2004) and also in the wild boar population in Finland (Hälli et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%