2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2022.105591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prevalence of Chlamydia psittaci in confiscated Psittacidae in Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
4

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…En la revisión bibliográfica, solo se encontraron cuatro estudios sobre C. psittaci en Colombia ( cuadro 5 ) 25 , 27 - 29 .…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…En la revisión bibliográfica, solo se encontraron cuatro estudios sobre C. psittaci en Colombia ( cuadro 5 ) 25 , 27 - 29 .…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…En los cuatro estudios encontrados, se reportó la presencia directa o indirecta de la bacteria en aves. En dos de ellos se encontraron prevalencias entre el 79 y el 90 % 25 , 29 ; en uno se indicó una prevalencia del 25,4 % 28 y en el último solo se detectó un ave positiva de las seis estudiadas 27 ( cuadro 5 ).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Our environmental sampling strategy was based on guidance developed by USDA for environmental monitoring of avian influenza (APHIS, 2022), which might not be entirely applicable to C. psittaci Limitations of environmental testing should be accounted for during investigations. First, faecal swabs have a lower detection sensitivity compared with cloacal swabs (Balsamo et al, 2017;Ruiz-Laiton et al, 2022), and should therefore be conducted in parallel to swabbing individual birds, as was done in this investigation. Ideally, birds should be tested for chlamydial DNA no less than 6-10 days after the end of antibiotic treatment to confirm that treatment was successful (Guzman et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, E/B, WC and M56 genotypes were detected in ducks, Wolfsen cattle and muskrats, respectively. All genotypes are potentially transmissible to humans, and they can cause severe disease and even death [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the culture of C. psittaci represents a laborious, time-consuming technique, and it requires a level 3 biosafety facility in laboratory [ 14 ]. Serological tests are used for diagnosis, which are still non-specific and difficult to interpret [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. Other methods, such as immunochemistry, are actually used for the detection of this pathogen in cytological and histological preparations [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%