2006
DOI: 10.5194/angeo-24-2743-2006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The presence of large sunspots near the central solar meridian at the times of modern Japanese auroral observations

Abstract: Abstract. The validity of a technique developed by the authors to identify historical occurrences of intense geomagnetic storms, which is based on finding approximately coincident observations of sunspots and aurorae recorded in East Asian histories, is corroborated using more modern sunspot and auroral observations. Scientific observations of aurorae in Japan during the interval 1957-2004 are used to identify geomagnetic storms that are sufficiently intense to produce auroral displays at low geomagnetic latit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the method has to be partly automated because of the large number (1074) of major geomagnetic storms in the interval 1874 April 17-1976 December 31. In particular, it is impracticable to show all the solar images for the six-day intervals immediately before these major storms, contrary to the situation in the paper by Willis et al (2006), so statistical results have to be presented instead. The main statistical results, which are given in Table 2, are discussed in Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the method has to be partly automated because of the large number (1074) of major geomagnetic storms in the interval 1874 April 17-1976 December 31. In particular, it is impracticable to show all the solar images for the six-day intervals immediately before these major storms, contrary to the situation in the paper by Willis et al (2006), so statistical results have to be presented instead. The main statistical results, which are given in Table 2, are discussed in Sect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Even an "average" observer would probably have been able to see at least one sunspot with the unaided eye before 24 of these 30 events, which represents 186 D. M. Willis et al: Large sunspots and major geomagnetic storms an 80% success rate. As noted by Willis et al (2006), this corroboration of the validity of the technique used to identify historical occurrences of intense geomagnetic storms (Willis et al, 2005) is important because early unaided-eye observations of sunspots and aurorae provide the only possible means of identifying individual geomagnetic storms during the greater part of the past two millennia. Indeed, this identification of geomagnetic storms is only feasible because the dates of many unaided-eye observations of sunspots and aurorae during the last 2000 years are known precisely (year, month and day all recorded exactly).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations