The predictive capabilities of a novel cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived marker of cardiopulmonary reserve on established prognostic surrogate markers in patients with pulmonary vascular disease: results of a longitudinal pilot study

Baillie, T.; Sidharta, S.; Steele, Peter; Worthley, Stephen G.; Teo, K.; Sanders, Prashanthan; Nicholls, Stephen J.; Worthley, M.

doi:10.1186/s12968-016-0316-4

Cited by 8 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As a result, there continues to be a need to focus on cost-effective medicine with avoidance of repetitive and redundant testing. CMR has often been recognized as a cost-effective/comprehensive test for evaluation and prognosis in myocarditis with T2 mapping [54], pulmonary vascular disease [55], implantable cardiodefibrillators (ICD) [56], and amyloidosis [57]. 2018 publications in this area included:…”

Section: Outcomes/prognosismentioning

confidence: 99%

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review

Manning

2019

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There were 89 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) in 2017, including 76 original research papers, 4 reviews, 5 technical notes, 1 guideline, and 3 corrections. The volume was down slightly from 2017 with a corresponding 15% decrease in manuscript submissions from 405 to 346 and thus reflects a slight increase in the acceptance rate from 25 to 26%. The decrease in submissions for the year followed the initiation of the increased author processing charge (APC) for Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) members for manuscripts submitted after June 30, 2018. The quality of the submissions continues to be high. The 2018 JCMR Impact Factor (which is published in June 2019) was slightly lower at 5.1 (vs. 5.46 for 2017; as published in June 2018. The 2018 impact factor means that on average, each JCMR published in 2016 and 2017 was cited 5.1 times in 2018. Our 5 year impact factor was 5.82.In accordance with Open-Access publishing guidelines of BMC, the JCMR articles are published on-line in a continuus fashion in the chronologic order of acceptance, with no collating of the articles into sections or special thematic issues. For this reason, over the years, the Editors have felt that it is useful for the JCMR audience to annually summarize the publications into broad areas of interest or themes, so that readers can view areas of interest in a single article in relation to each other and contemporaneous JCMR publications. In this publication, the manuscripts are presented in broad themes and set in context with related literature and previously published JCMR papers to guide continuity of thought within the journal. In addition, as in the past two years, I have used this publication to also convey information regarding the editorial process and as a “State of our JCMR.”This is the 12th year of JCMR as an open-access publication with BMC (formerly known as Biomed Central). The timing of the JCMR transition to the open access platform was “ahead of the curve” and a tribute to the vision of Dr. Matthias Friedrich, the SCMR Publications Committee Chair and Dr. Dudley Pennell, the JCMR editor-in-chief at the time. The open-access system has dramatically increased the reading and citation of JCMR publications and I hope that you, our authors, will continue to send your very best, high quality manuscripts to JCMR for consideration. It takes a village to run a journal and I thank our very dedicated Associate Editors, Guest Editors, Reviewers for their efforts to ensure that the review process occurs in a timely and responsible manner. These efforts have allowed the JCMR to continue as the premier journal of our field. This entire process would also not be possible without the dedication and efforts of our managing editor, Diana Gethers. Finally, I thank you for entrusting me with the editorship of the JCMR as I begin my 4th year as your editor-in-chief. It has been a tremendous experience for me and the opportunity to review manuscripts that reflect the best in our field rema...

show abstract

Section: Outcomes/prognosismentioning

confidence: 99%

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review

Manning

2019

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this study of 20 patients with pulmonary artery hypertension who underwent CMR at baseline and at 6 months of guideline-appropriate management, Baillie et al [42] performed phase-contrast CMR of mean pulmonary artery blood flow velocity at rest and during continuous infusion of adenosine. Changes in the CMR parameters during the 6 months correlated with functional and biochemical changes.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2017

Manning

2018

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There were 106 articles published in the Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (JCMR) in 2017, including 92 original research papers, 3 reviews, 9 technical notes, and 1 Position paper, 1 erratum and 1 correction. The volume was similar to 2016 despite an increase in manuscript submissions to 405 and thus reflects a slight decrease in the acceptance rate to 26.7%. The quality of the submissions continues to be high. The 2017 JCMR Impact Factor (which is published in June 2018) was minimally lower at 5.46 (vs. 5.71 for 2016; as published in June 2017), which is the second highest impact factor ever recorded for JCMR. The 2017 impact factor means that an average, each JCMR paper that were published in 2015 and 2016 was cited 5.46 times in 2017.In accordance with Open-Access publishing of Biomed Central, the JCMR articles are published on-line in continuus fashion and in the chronologic order of acceptance, with no collating of the articles into sections or special thematic issues. For this reason, over the years, the Editors have felt that it is useful to annually summarize the publications into broad areas of interest or theme, so that readers can view areas of interest in a single article in relation to each other and other contemporary JCMR articles. In this publication, the manuscripts are presented in broad themes and set in context with related literature and previously published JCMR papers to guide continuity of thought within the journal. In addition, I have elected to use this format to convey information regarding the editorial process to the readership.I hope that you find the open-access system increases wider reading and citation of your papers, and that you will continue to send your very best, high quality manuscripts to JCMR for consideration. I thank our very dedicated Associate Editors, Guest Editors, and Reviewers for their efforts to ensure that the review process occurs in a timely and responsible manner and that the JCMR continues to be recognized as the forefront journal of our field. And finally, I thank you for entrusting me with the editorship of the JCMR as I begin my 3rd year as your editor-in-chief. It has been a tremendous learning experience for me and the opportunity to review manuscripts that reflect the best in our field remains a great joy and highlight of my week!

show abstract

“…Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is accurate and reproducible in the assessment of cardiac size, morphology, and function and allows noninvasive assessment of blood flow. [3][4][5] Recently, time-resolved phase contrastedmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with velocity encoding along all 3 flow directions and 3-dimensional anatomic coverage (also termed "4-dimensional [4D] flow MRI"), provides unrivaled capabilities for comprehensive analysis of complex blood flow patterns using new visualization tools. 6,7 Pulmonary arterial wall shear stress, blood flow, pulse-wave velocities, and kinetic energy losses also have been noninvasively evaluated with 4D flow MRI.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Qualification of Ventricular Flow in Patients With Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension With 4-dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Deng

Zhang³

et al. 2023

Journal of Thoracic Imaging

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Our goal was to study both right and left ventricular blood flow in patients with precapillary pulmonary hypertension (pre-PH) with 4-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to analyze their correlation with cardiac functional metrics on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and hemodynamics from right heart catheterization (RHC). Materials and Methods: 129 patients (64 females, mean age 47 ± 13 y) including 105 patients with pre-PH (54 females, mean age 49 ± 13 y) and 24 patients without PH (10 females, mean age 40 ± 12 y) were retrospectively included. All patients underwent CMR and RHC within 48 hours. 4D flow MRI was acquired using a 3-dimensional retrospectively electrocardiograph-triggered, navigator-gated phase contrast sequence. Right and left ventricular flow components including the percentages of direct flow (PDF), retained inflow (PRI), delayed ejection flow (PDE), and residual volume (PRVo) were respectively quantified. The ventricular flow components between patients with pre-PH and non-PH were compared and correlations of flow components with CMR functional metrics and hemodynamics measured with RHC were analyzed. Biventricular flow components were compared between survivors and deceased patients during the perioperative period. Results: Right ventricular (RV) PDF and PDE significantly correlated with RVEDV and RV ejection fraction. RV PDF negatively correlated with pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) and pulmonary vascular resistance. When the RV PDF was <11%, the sensitivity and specificity of RV PDF for predicting mean PAP ≥25 mm Hg were 88.6% and 98.7%, respectively, with an area under the curve value of 0.95 ± 0.02. When RV PRVo was more than 42%, the sensitivity and specificity of RV PRVo for predicting mean PAP ≥25 mm Hg were 85.7% and 98.5%, respectively, with an area under the curve value of 0.95 ± 0.01. Nine patients died during the perioperative period. Biventricular PDF, RV PDE, and PRI of survivors were higher than nonsurvivors whereas RV PRVo increased in deceased patients. Conclusions: Biventricular flow analysis with 4D flow MRI provides comprehensive information about the severity and cardiac remodeling of PH and may be a predictor of perioperative death of patients with pre-PH.

show abstract

The predictive capabilities of a novel cardiovascular magnetic resonance derived marker of cardiopulmonary reserve on established prognostic surrogate markers in patients with pulmonary vascular disease: results of a longitudinal pilot study

Cited by 8 publications

References 19 publications

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance: 2017/2018 in review

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 2017

Qualification of Ventricular Flow in Patients With Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension With 4-dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About