1994
The Preauricular Portion of the Rhytidectomy Incision
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
13
1
0
0
Citation Types
0
8
0
0
Year Published
1996
2024
Publication Types
Select...
11
2
1
Relationship
0
14
Authors
Journals
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
References 6 publications
0
8
0
0
“…Regarding the placement of the preauricular incision, Becker 4 agrees that the posttragal incision yields improved cosmesis. In his study, 4 surgeons compared postoperative close-up photographs, taken at least 6 months after surgery, of 18 women who had received pretragal incisions with 18 photographs of women who had received posterior tragal edge incisions.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Regarding the placement of the preauricular incision, Becker 4 agrees that the posttragal incision yields improved cosmesis. In his study, 4 surgeons compared postoperative close-up photographs, taken at least 6 months after surgery, of 18 women who had received pretragal incisions with 18 photographs of women who had received posterior tragal edge incisions.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…15 Four studies described both pretragal and posttragal incisions among their study population. 6,[42][43][44] Becker 1994 performed a comparative study comparing 18 pretragal incision scars and 18 posttragal incision scars. Four surgeons scored each scar from 1 to 5, with 5 being the best, and each scar was greater than 6 months from surgery.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43,53,54 Castello et al sent patients a satisfaction questionnaire created by the authors with 5 questions regarding satisfaction with rhytidectomy results. 36 Numerous studies used photographs from varying postoperative lengths of time which were blinded and graded by external judges who ranged from outside plastic surgeons 38,42,55,56 to nonphysician medical staff members 50 to a combination of facial plastic surgeons, maxillofacial surgeons, and makeup artists. 43 Very few studies used the same scar outcome grading scale.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
