1995
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(95)00794-l
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pp → ppπ0 reaction near the kinematical threshold

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent study of the pp → ppπ 0 reaction at energies close to threshold, it is found that the angular distributions of the outgoing particles are isotropic, in agreement with the assumption that the reaction proceeds as a 33 P 0 → 31 S 0 s 0 transition [1,2]. Several model calculations [3][4][5][6] of S-wave pion production, which are based on a single nucleon and a pion rescattering mechanism, under estimate the cross section by a factor of 3-5.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…In a recent study of the pp → ppπ 0 reaction at energies close to threshold, it is found that the angular distributions of the outgoing particles are isotropic, in agreement with the assumption that the reaction proceeds as a 33 P 0 → 31 S 0 s 0 transition [1,2]. Several model calculations [3][4][5][6] of S-wave pion production, which are based on a single nucleon and a pion rescattering mechanism, under estimate the cross section by a factor of 3-5.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…B.50). The process, NN → NNπ, has been extensively studied in several experiments over the last twenty years [112,113,114,115,116,117,118]. We have, therefore, constructed well defined background cross sections on top of the resonance contributions for all possible isospin channels.…”
Section: Three-body Collisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All terms subdominant to the ones above are model-dependent. Precise cross section data measured in Bloomington [1] and Uppsala [2] are roughly five times larger [3] than the simplest widely agreed-on prediction of the two diagrams in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%