2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential of a portable, point-of-care electronic nose to diagnose tuberculosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
43
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
43
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Development of accurate, efficient, and noninvasive methods to detect MTBC in wild swine would greatly benefit surveillance and disease management efforts. Volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis technology is being explored extensively for its potential to detect tuberculosis in humans as well as in other species, such as cattle (Bos taurus) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Use of these compounds, obtained from various biological samples such as breath and feces, has great potential to fulfill needs for an ideal remote or point-of-care surveillance tool in all species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of accurate, efficient, and noninvasive methods to detect MTBC in wild swine would greatly benefit surveillance and disease management efforts. Volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis technology is being explored extensively for its potential to detect tuberculosis in humans as well as in other species, such as cattle (Bos taurus) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) [4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Use of these compounds, obtained from various biological samples such as breath and feces, has great potential to fulfill needs for an ideal remote or point-of-care surveillance tool in all species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study in Bangladesh used a prototype of the e-nose (participants exhaled into a bag, then the bag content was examined using a laboratory version of the e-nose), and with smaller sample size [11]. Other studies with e-nose devices did not diagnose PTB among patients with suspected PTB [12,24,25]. The sensitivity in our study was modest, while specificity was low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…They found sensitivity of 93.5% and a specificity of 85.3% to differentiate PTB patients from healthy controls, and a sensitivity of 76.5% and specificity of 87.2% when differentiating PTB patients from other subjects (non-PTB patients and healthy subjects) [11]. However, this e-nose prototype used separate bags to collect exhaled breath that might introduce errors due to interaction between the Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) with the bags materials [12]. A newer device that is portable, use rechargeable battery, and does not use separate bags (Aeonose) was tested in Paraguay, and showed high sensitivity (88%) and specificity (92%) to differentiate PTB patients from asthma/COPD and healthy subjects [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ghasemi-Varnamkhasti M [22] et al applied bionic olfaction technology to detect beer aging; Natale C D [23,24] et al applied this technology to detect the freshness of fish. Gobbi E [25,26,27,28] et al applied bionic olfaction technology to colony detection, with high accuracy; Lim J H [29,30] et al applied this technology to medical research. Therefore, the electronic nose has potential in detecting fish meal quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%