2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.coesh.2022.100360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential influence of hormesis on evolution of resistance to herbicides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests the possibility that the genetic and physiological processes controlling glyphosate hormesis and resistance might be independent, so the selection of the former does not necessarily result in selection of the latter. Thus, if hormesis indeed favors herbicide resistance evolution, our results support the hypothesis that it does so by increasing the survival and reproduction of plants exposed to sublethal doses, which ultimately will favor a faster accumulation of resistance alleles and the transition from susceptible to resistant populations, especially in cases of nontarget‐site resistance 29,57 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This suggests the possibility that the genetic and physiological processes controlling glyphosate hormesis and resistance might be independent, so the selection of the former does not necessarily result in selection of the latter. Thus, if hormesis indeed favors herbicide resistance evolution, our results support the hypothesis that it does so by increasing the survival and reproduction of plants exposed to sublethal doses, which ultimately will favor a faster accumulation of resistance alleles and the transition from susceptible to resistant populations, especially in cases of nontarget‐site resistance 29,57 …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…There is evidence indicating that hormesis can be subject to selection and influence fitness 58–61 . It has been proposed that an important consequence of hormesis is that it could influence the evolution of more competitive weed biotypes 29,62 . Although it is not clear whether the increase in competitive ability documented here is directly related to the increase in glyphosate hormesis, selection forces present within the crop can certainly favor both processes separately and complementarily.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three significant historical models including the threshold dose response, the linear non‐threshold (LNT) model, and hormesis model have been constructed. Hormesis describes a biphasic dose response relationship featuring stimulation at a low dose and inhibition at a high dose, 1 and has become a mainstream theory of toxicology in recent years 2,3 . Unlike the threshold or LNT models, the hormesis model can explain low‐level stress, including modest biological responses which are the opposite to the responses to high‐level stress 4,5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great number of dose–response studies indicate that hormesis is a common phenomenon, occurring in numerous organisms exposed to singular or combined environmental stressors, such as pharmaceuticals, heavy metals, micro/nanoplastics, organic flame retardants, pesticides, and rare earths. While biological responses to low exposure levels are often beneficial, exposure to doses below the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL; hereafter subthreshold doses) does not always translate to beneficial responses. , For example, subthreshold contaminant doses can enhance the virulence of phytopathogenic microbes and promote the resistance of crop pests with significant implications for crop production. ,, Subthreshold contaminant exposures can also stimulate infectious animal/human pathogens and promote their resistance to antibiotics and other drugs, threatening long-term sustainability. Importantly, the hormetic function of common pathways that regulate cancer progress indicate that current regulatory standards may not protect adequately against cancer risks. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%