2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale: reliability and validity of a clinician-rated measure of participation in acute rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
153
1
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
153
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…11 The PRPS is a 6-point Likert-type measure with higher scores indicating better participation (1= none, 2 = poor, 3= fair, 4 = good, 5 = very good and 6 = excellent). The PRPS relies on clinicians’ observation requiring no self report data from the participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…11 The PRPS is a 6-point Likert-type measure with higher scores indicating better participation (1= none, 2 = poor, 3= fair, 4 = good, 5 = very good and 6 = excellent). The PRPS relies on clinicians’ observation requiring no self report data from the participants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work in over 200 patients with varying diagnoses in rehabilitation had found the PPRS to exhibit inter-rater reliability (ICC= .91–.96) and predictive validity against change in motor FIM scores. 11 It has been proposed that the PRPS may have particular utility in populations who are older, frail and in which outcomes are less universally favorable such as those with hip fracture or stroke. 11 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[33][34][35][36][37][38][39] Therapists also rated patient participation using the Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale for each therapy session. 40 The Pittsburgh Participation Scale uses a 6-point Likert scale (eg, 1Zno participation, 3Zfair participation, 6Zexcellent participation).…”
Section: Point-of-care Documentationmentioning
confidence: 99%