1984
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(84)90143-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Piecewise Parabolic Method (PPM) for gas-dynamical simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
2,799
0
13

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3,646 publications
(2,883 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
13
2,799
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The answer to this question is problem dependent. For many problems containing only simple shocks with almost linear smooth solutions in between, such as the solutions to most Riemann problems (shock tube problems), a good second order method, such as PPM [4] or other TVD [6] methods, would be the optimal choice. However, when the solution contains both discontinuities and complex solution structures in the smooth regions, a higher order method may be more economical in CPU time, as demonstrated by the examples in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The answer to this question is problem dependent. For many problems containing only simple shocks with almost linear smooth solutions in between, such as the solutions to most Riemann problems (shock tube problems), a good second order method, such as PPM [4] or other TVD [6] methods, would be the optimal choice. However, when the solution contains both discontinuities and complex solution structures in the smooth regions, a higher order method may be more economical in CPU time, as demonstrated by the examples in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advective terms in POLCOMS are computed using the piecewise parabolic method (PPM, Colella and Woodward, 1984), which has low numerical diffusion and better preserves frontal features (James, 1996;1997). By default POLCOMS does not apply explicit horizontal diffusion and at the Liverpool Bay scale consideration of diffusion has little impact on the frontal position (Norman et al, 2014d).…”
Section: Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intense period of development of such limiters during the 1980s and 1990s was marked by a series of acronyms such as the second-order MUSCL and TVD scheme [135,100,192], cubic-order PPM scheme [50], and the class of higher-order (W)ENO schemes [102,101,186,141,49,79].…”
Section: = 1 δTmentioning
confidence: 99%