“…It is based on two considerations: firstly, the amplitude and latency of the BIC ABR change characteristically with the ITD and, to a lesser extend, with the ILD of the stimulus. Observed consistently across species, irrespective of the relative sizes of their LSO and MSO (Irving & Harrison, ) or their head size (Benichoux et al., ; Laumen, Ferber et al., ), the BIC ABR amplitude decreases with increasing ITD or ILD and the latency of the BIC ABR increases with increasing ITD (guinea pig: Dobie & Berlin, ; human: Furst et al., ; cat: Ungan et al., ; guinea pig: Goksoy et al., ; human: Riedel & Kollmeier, ; gerbil: Laumen, Tollin et al., ; barn owl: Palanca‐Castan et al., ; rodent species: Benichoux et al., ). And secondly, any such dependence observed in a measure derived from a far‐field potential such as the ABR must have its source in the activity of single neurons and should be observable in the responses of those.…”