2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2008.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The physics of a coflow micro-extractor: Interface stability and optimal extraction length

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,3,4 Another recent trend is to use hydrophobic ducts 29 through which an organic phase may be separated (somewhat similar to a hydrophobic membrane, but with larger pores and in fewer number), or to stabilize the interface of two contacting phases with the use of micropillars. 30 These two last approaches avoid the use of a hydrophobic membrane, and as reported by Castell et al, 29 small solids in suspension (2 μm size) 29 can be handled more easily.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…1,3,4 Another recent trend is to use hydrophobic ducts 29 through which an organic phase may be separated (somewhat similar to a hydrophobic membrane, but with larger pores and in fewer number), or to stabilize the interface of two contacting phases with the use of micropillars. 30 These two last approaches avoid the use of a hydrophobic membrane, and as reported by Castell et al, 29 small solids in suspension (2 μm size) 29 can be handled more easily.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The results were presented in our previous work [9] with R s = 1 for an uninterrupted interface. In all other cases, the R s value is 0.22, Q 1 = 0.6 µl min −1 , D = 10 −9 m 2 s −1 and R s,eq receives the values of 0.75 for an ideally thin membrane, 0.52 for lozenges, 0.49 for a thick membrane, 0.43 for circles and 0.28 for square pillars.…”
Section: Extraction Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This interface stability is determined by the balance of the Laplace pressure and the hydrodynamic pressure difference between the two phases ( Fig. 1c) [17,18], which relates to the geometry of the microchannels, interfacial tension between the two phases, and the interaction of the two phases with the microchannel walls (detailed derivations were provided in section 3 of the supplementary information). Previously, various strategies have been explored to stabilize the two-phase interface during Fig.…”
Section: Atpm Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…d Branch-connection length design patterns with n (n= 1,2,3…) co-flow runs. e Schematic illustration of the ATPM-based microextraction procedure liquid-liquid extraction in parallel flow, including placement of membranes [19] or microstructures between two phases [18,20], partial surface fictionalization [21,22], and the use of surfactants [23]. Although these strategies were effective in stabilizing the liquid-liquid interface, their uses have been shown to bring about such disadvantages as reducing the extraction rate or increasing fabrication difficulty.…”
Section: Atpm Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%