2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The phenotype and function of naturally existing regulatory dendritic cells in nematode-infected mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the first instance, the question should be addressed of which host cells are targeted by HES. Previous work on H. polygyrus infection has highlighted the parasite's suppressive effects through dendritic cells [74][75][76] an equivalent amount of recombinant mammalian TGF-β could not suppress allergic immune responses at sensitisation or at challenge; HES suppression at sensitisation was heat-stable, while the HES TGF-β signal is heat labile [54]; and Treg proportions, numbers and activation levels were lower with HES administration at sensitisation than in positive controls. Therefore, we hypothesise that HES contains other immunomodulatory factors than the TGF-β mimic and these are largely responsible for the suppressive effect seen with HES administration at sensitisation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first instance, the question should be addressed of which host cells are targeted by HES. Previous work on H. polygyrus infection has highlighted the parasite's suppressive effects through dendritic cells [74][75][76] an equivalent amount of recombinant mammalian TGF-β could not suppress allergic immune responses at sensitisation or at challenge; HES suppression at sensitisation was heat-stable, while the HES TGF-β signal is heat labile [54]; and Treg proportions, numbers and activation levels were lower with HES administration at sensitisation than in positive controls. Therefore, we hypothesise that HES contains other immunomodulatory factors than the TGF-β mimic and these are largely responsible for the suppressive effect seen with HES administration at sensitisation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role of DCs in inducing regulatory responses is illustrated by the action of schistosome lysophosphatidylserine, which acts on human DCs to promote IL-10-producing Tr1 cells (290), and the egg molecule -1, which drives murine DCs from mice to induce Foxp3 expression in T cells in vitro (316). In the H. polygyrus model, infection expands an unusual phenotype of CD11c low CD103 Ϫ DCs, which preferentially drive Foxp3 induction in naive T cells (165,258), while there is a loss of CD8␣ intermediate DCs that normally traffic from the epithelium to the draining lymph node (21).…”
Section: Dendritic Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, how helminth coinfection alters or suppresses the in vivo response of those relevant DC subsets to microbial agonists needs to be investigated. Two studies have demonstrated the emergence of a CD103 − CD11c lo DC population, distinct from plasmacytoid DCs, during chronic helminth infection 118,119 . CD11c lo DCs were ineffective stimulators of an effector response by CD4 + T cells and instead strongly drove expression of the transcription factor Foxp3 in naive CD4 + T cells, which resulted in the generation of T reg cells.…”
Section: Helminths Inhibit DC Activationmentioning
confidence: 99%