2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2016.09.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The peopling of eastern Beringia and its archaeological complexities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some colleagues have argued that all sites should be subsumed into a single Beringian Tradition in which at times ancient Beringians would select either a microblade‐based toolkit or a non‐microblade‐based toolkit, depending on the behaviors to be performed at sites during different seasons of occupation (Holmes, ; Potter, ; Potter et al, ; Wygal, ). By grouping potentially chronologically distinct industries together without support from robust site‐function and seasonality data, however, such interpretations mask the potential significance of the variability present, especially when chronological patterning is found between technological complexes (Graf et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some colleagues have argued that all sites should be subsumed into a single Beringian Tradition in which at times ancient Beringians would select either a microblade‐based toolkit or a non‐microblade‐based toolkit, depending on the behaviors to be performed at sites during different seasons of occupation (Holmes, ; Potter, ; Potter et al, ; Wygal, ). By grouping potentially chronologically distinct industries together without support from robust site‐function and seasonality data, however, such interpretations mask the potential significance of the variability present, especially when chronological patterning is found between technological complexes (Graf et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 50 archaeological components dating to the late Pleistocene (LP) and early Holocene (EH) have been documented in central Alaska, but few of these are located in the interior Alaska Range (Blong, ; Potter, , ; Wygal, ). The earliest evidence for human occupation of the interior Alaska Range is at Teklanika West (12,900 calibrated year [cal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low frequency and ephemeral nature of LP/EH archaeological sites in the Alaska Range has been argued to represent a residentially mobile LP/EH land-use system primarily focused in the lowlands of the Tanana River basin and foothills of the Nenana River basin (Potter, 2008a(Potter, , 2008bPotter, Holmes, & Yesner, 2013). However, despite low archaeological visibility, there is evidence that huntergatherers procured upland resources in the Alaska Range as highly mobile, logistically oriented groups spread through the Alaska Range and into southern Alaska during the Younger Dryas (YD) and EH (Blong, 2018;Graf & Bigelow, 2011;Guthrie, 2017;Mason, Bowers, & Hopkins, 2001;Potter et al, 2013;Wygal, 2018). Supporting early use of the uplands, lithic raw material sourcing studies indicate that some lithic raw materials found at lowland LP/EH archaeological sites were likely procured from upland sources (Coffman & Rasic, 2015;Reuther, Slobodina, Rasic, Cook, & Speakman, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More detailed comparisons of dates on microblade and nonmicroblade sites appear elsewhere (Bever 2006; Graf and Bigelow 2011; Wygal 2018). In Alaska, among nonmicroblade sites, there are various occupations relating to the Nenana complex or other unassigned sites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Alaska, among nonmicroblade sites, there are various occupations relating to the Nenana complex or other unassigned sites. One of the ongoing debates in Beringia, and central Alaska in particular, relates to the exact relationship between microblade and nonmicroblade sites (Goebel 2011; Wygal 2011, 2018; Yesner and Pearson 2002). In this respect, Swan Point CZ4b was a turning point in this debate, since it was the first example in Alaska of a pre–Nenana complex site with an undisputable microblade technology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%