The People Paradox: Self-Esteem Striving, Immortality Ideologies, and Human Response to Climate Change

Abstract

ABSTRACT. In 1973, Ernest Becker, a cultural anthropologist cross-trained in philosophy, sociology, and psychiatry, invoked consciousness of self and the inevitability of death as the primary sources of human anxiety and repression. He proposed that the psychological basis of cooperation, competition, and emotional and mental health is a tendency to hold tightly to anxiety-buffering cultural world views or "immortality projects" that serve as the basis for self-esteem and meaning. Although he focused mainly on social and political outcomes like war, torture, and genocide, he was increasingly aware that materialism, denial of nature, and immortality-striving efforts to control, rather than sanctify, the natural world were problems whose severity was increasing. In this paper I review Becker's ideas and suggest ways in which they illuminate human response to global climate change. Because immortality projects range from belief in technology and materialism to reverence for nature or belief in a celestial god, they act both as barriers to and facilitators of sustainable practices. I propose that Becker's cross-disciplinary "science of man," and the predictions it generates for proximate-level determinants of social behavior, add significantly to our understanding of and potential for managing the people paradox, i.e., that the very things that bring us symbolic immortality often conflict with our prospects for survival. Analysis of immortality projects as one of the proximate barriers to addressing climate change is both cautionary and hopeful, providing insights that should be included in the cross-disciplinary quest to uncover new pathways toward rational, social change.

Communicating Climate Change: Closing the Science‐Action Gap

“…Audience segmentation clearly indicates that a 'one size fits all' approach will almost certainly fail. Without solid audience knowledge, outreach campaigns may not generate more than fleeting attention, fail to meet the information needs people have, and generate values and world-view-based resistance to considering the information communicated (Dickinson 2009;Jost and Hunyady 2005).…”

Mortality awareness and water decisions: a social psychological analysis of supply-management, demand-management and soft-path paradigms

“…These studies illustrate how our responses to mortality salience can influence our attitudes and behaviours towards the natural environment and resource use (Dickinson, 2009). They can help explain why it is so difficult to get individuals to sustain behavioural changes -say, for household water efficiency or reducing bottled-water consumption.…”

“…For example, recent research demonstrates that the psychological response to perceived threats to self or society can make individuals less receptive to information about urban flooding prevention (Mann & Wolfe, 2016). In her research on climate change and individuals' rejection of behaviour modification, Dickinson (2009) wrote, "The behaviours people exhibit are not necessarily those that reduce risk of death, and in fact they may sometimes increase [risk of death] as long as [the behaviours] also bolster the individual's symbolic self and the complex, immortality-striving hero system that defines it. "…”

Civic ecology practices: insights from practice theory

“…In that positive meanings associated with practices may facilitate participation, this research would suggest an alternative to approaches that attempt to influence environmental behaviors through negative messaging where little attention is paid to positive meanings or to the elements holding a practice together, and in fact the desired behaviors may have threatening meanings for target audiences leading to unwillingness to adopt them (cf. Dickinson 2009, Spaargaren 2011.…”