2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2509(01)00131-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The palladium catalysed oxidation of methane: reaction kinetics and the effect of diffusion barriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
53
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, the kinetic parameters obtained should be treated as apparent and they will be used for exclusively simulations in order to compare different reactor internals and catalysts. Similar effects of mass transport limitations have already been reported for methane oxidation by a number of authors [19][20][21]. The results of the simulations performed for methane and carbon monoxide combustion over the cobalt and palladium catalysts applied for the wire gauze and monolithic reactors are presented in Fig.…”
Section: Reactor Performancesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In this way, the kinetic parameters obtained should be treated as apparent and they will be used for exclusively simulations in order to compare different reactor internals and catalysts. Similar effects of mass transport limitations have already been reported for methane oxidation by a number of authors [19][20][21]. The results of the simulations performed for methane and carbon monoxide combustion over the cobalt and palladium catalysts applied for the wire gauze and monolithic reactors are presented in Fig.…”
Section: Reactor Performancesupporting
confidence: 79%
“…26,27 As oxygen is generally in great excess with respect to methane, oxygen concentration remains constant, being the reaction rate independent from this parameter. Arrhenius dependence of the kinetic constant has also been assumed.…”
Section: Determination Of the Kinetic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The figure demonstrates a significant difference between the three types of models with the Liu et al simplification for parallel pore diffusion demonstrating similar results as the more in-depth calculation. If a choice had to be made between diffusion models, the parallel pore model is widely utilized and has been proven to provide good accuracy in comparison to experiments [23,30,34,36,37,54,61].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%