The pace of life and temporal resources in a neighborhood of an edge city

Abstract

Recently, the phenomenon of social acceleration, which has profound impacts on everyday life, has attracted some attention from social scientists. At the same time, an increased engagement with social practices that are related to slowing down has also been highlighted, thereby unveiling an inherent tension between fast and slow times in contemporary societies. However, little attention has been paid to how fast and slow times are spatially dispersed and rooted.This study contributes to current discussions on the pace of life by considering the dynamics of speeding up and slowing down in the everyday life of residents in a neighborhood of an edge city and the role played by local resources in the performance of everyday life practices. We undertook our study in the Colinas do Cruzeiro neighborhood, in the municipality of Odivelas in the North of Lisbon's metropolitan area, where we conducted 21 in-depth narrative interviews with residents with the purpose of understanding the spatiotemporal organization of their daily lives and the role of the neighborhood's resources.Our results identify four different timestyles among the interviewees, all of them fluctuating between fast and slow temporalities in different ways. Thereafter, we identify and describe the main practices of speeding up and slowing down in the interviewees' everyday life and the local resources, which are mobilized in Colinas do Cruzeiro in order to perform these practices. We give some conclusions after a brief discussion of the results. Our main argument is that local resources play a vital role in an individual's ability to Time & Society 0(0) 1-24 ! The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav Downloaded from speed up or slow down and therefore more attention must be paid as to how local resources can become temporal advantages.

Eudaimonia Around the Kitchen: A Hermeneutic Approach to Understanding Food Well-Being in Consumers’ Lived Experiences

“…Kronos refers to “measurable time that is linear,” while kairos denotes time as “the instant transformed into action.” Whereas kronos represents a quantitative view of time that pressures individuals by calling for many fast and ephemeral actions, kairos is qualitative. It is not measured in seconds but in “moments”; it supports the need for rest and relaxation and promotes the idea of enjoying life in sweetness and slowness (Agger 2004; Eriksen 2001; Paiva, Cachino, and Barata-Salgueiro 2017). The difficult process of organizing one’s time may create time poverty, so “that individuals do not have enough discretionary time…to engage in activities that build their social and human capital” (Kalenkoski and Hamrick 2014, p. 6650).…”

“…Time poverty is both an individual issue and related to societal organization. As shown by Paiva, Cachino, and Barata-Salgueiro (2017), local temporal resources, broadly speaking (i.e., the urban development of retail and service shops, transportation, public space, etc. ), play a vital role in an individual’s ability to slow down.…”

Chronotopes of urban centralities: Looking for prominent urban times and places

“…As a result, urban society is markedly synchronised and synchorised; Parkes and Thrift (1979, p. 361) call it “a periodic environment,” referring to the recurrent nature of collective spatiotemporal routines reflected in distinct urban rhythms. Urban everyday life is a polyrhythmic ensemble of overlying individual rhythms (Paiva, 2016; Paiva et al, 2017) that is more or less orchestrated by place‐based social schedules. They produce the typical space‐time regime, which is conceptualised by Cachinho and Paiva (2021) as a kind of territorialised temporal structure of each individual urban place (e.g., street, neighbourhood, city) or community (Brighenti & Kärrholm, 2018; Osman & Mulíček, 2017; Stavrides, 2013).…”

“…In the medieval city, regular daily prayers played an important role as time markers, keeping the urban rhythm, to be later replaced by more secular times and beats linked mainly to the economic production and consumption aspects of city life (Madanipour, 2017). Contemporary Western urban societies possess many pacemakers that generate specific collective timing and the sequencing of the urban day (Paiva et al, 2017). The beginning and end of the work or school day, lunchtime and television primetime are examples of such markers (Mulíček et al, 2016) that may be considered “micro‐horizons”, anchoring directly the individual routine behaviour and indirectly the collective spatiotemporal structure of the day.…”

Continuous Production and New Forms of Labour: A Case for Reclaiming Public Time

“…A number of disciplines and perspectives are represented in existing literature. These include (among many others) studies on the urban hardware of information and communication technologies (ICTs) (Graham, 2001), the night-time city (Eldridge, 2019; Dimmer, Solomon, & Morris, 2017; Shaw, 2015, 2018; Tadié & Permanadeli, 2015; Thomas & Bromley, 2000; Lovatt & O’Connor, 1995), social impacts of mobile technologies (Hampton, Goulet, & Albanesius, 2015; Paiva, Cachinho, & Barata-Salgueiro, 2017; Hatuka & Toch, 2016; Green, 2002; Townsend, 2000), the relationship between time, space and community (Stephens, 2010; McCann, 2003; Calhoun, 1998) and spatial effects of temporal politics (Kitchin, 2019; Charbgoo & Mareggi, 2018; Moore-Cherry & Bonnin, 2018; Mulíček and Osman, 2018; Simone & Fauzan, 2013; Stavrides, 2013). These scholars have examined in great depth the processes through which social and political forces contest the meaning of time and act upon it—causing it to be compressed, sped up, broken, divided into fractions, reorganized as rhythms, appropriated, revalourized and invoked strategically.…”