2011
DOI: 10.1001/archoto.2011.116
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

The Otologic Microbiome<subtitle>A Study of the Bacterial Microbiota in a Pediatric Patient With Chronic Serous Otitis Media Using <emph type="ital">16SrRNA</emph> Gene-Based Pyrosequencing</subtitle>

Abstract: Bacterial community analysis using pyrosequencing analysis revealed diverse, previously unknown bacterial communities in a set of pediatric middle ear, tonsil, and adenoid specimens. Our findings suggest that the adenoid may be a source site for both the middle ear and tonsil microbiota. An ecological framework is appropriate in comparative analysis of microbiota from nonsterile body sites.

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
45
16
14
0

Citation Types

5
61
2
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
63
3
1
1

Relationship

1
67

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 68 publications

(74 citation statements)
references

References 20 publications

5
61
2
6
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our microbiome results are also different from a previous microbiome study which largely detected Pseudomonas from middle ear fluid of a US child with chronic otitis media [10]. In another microbiome study of middle ear fluid from indigenous Australian children with effusive otitis media, the top species detected were Alloiococcus otitidis, Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus sp.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our microbiome results are also different from a previous microbiome study which largely detected Pseudomonas from middle ear fluid of a US child with chronic otitis media [10]. In another microbiome study of middle ear fluid from indigenous Australian children with effusive otitis media, the top species detected were Alloiococcus otitidis, Haemophilus influenzae and Streptococcus sp.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…There was little or no concordance of the microbe detected in the adenoid and the middle ear, both in patients with OME as well as in controls. This finding is in agreement with a previous report that performed 16S rDNA pyrosequencing of both niches, showing that the adenoid microbiota was more diverse and complex than of the middle ear in a child with OME [ 27 ]. As the adenoid is exposed to the nasal and oral microbial contents, differently from the enclosed cavity of the middle ear, this makes the adenoid more susceptible to be colonized by a higher load and more variety of microorganisms.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 93%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our findings may suggest a less significant role of Staphylococcus species in the formation of these conditions since our samples were collected from patients suffering from diseases such as chronic and intermittent rhinosinusitis, which are inherently biofilm-associated. Two 16s RNA-based studies reported that Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and Fusobacteria were the most common microorganisms identified in the adenoid vegetation [23,24]. These results support our findings, because both Veillonella, Streptococcus salivarius and Fusobactrium combined attribute to more than 60% of microorganisms in our samples.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 91%