2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0959774310000247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Origins of Chinese Writing: the Neolithic Evidence

Abstract: In China, a number of signs from some Late Neolithic contexts suggest that recoding activities were well developed before Chinese writing became widespread during the Shang period. Archaeological and palaeographic evidence indicates that mature writing is likely to have evolved from these earlier signing systems as a result of the increasing social and political complexity of the societies of the Late Neolithic. This article analyses three Late Neolithic signing systems that may have led to the mature Chinese … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other types of context would not have been suitable for this particular purpose but future research may choose to observe the influence of other appropriate contexts when considering the reports of writing on other artifacts with different types of provenance, either actual or assumed. For example, it remains to be seen if reports of indistinct writing on artifacts such as documents, weapons, pottery, metal vessels, and jewelry (e.g., [ 65 , 66 ]) are also affected by the expectations of observers. In these situations, expectations may be driven by provenances based on such things as an artifact’s age, where it was found, its use, and the culture to which it belonged, and illusory perceptions of writing may then occur in line with these expectations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other types of context would not have been suitable for this particular purpose but future research may choose to observe the influence of other appropriate contexts when considering the reports of writing on other artifacts with different types of provenance, either actual or assumed. For example, it remains to be seen if reports of indistinct writing on artifacts such as documents, weapons, pottery, metal vessels, and jewelry (e.g., [ 65 , 66 ]) are also affected by the expectations of observers. In these situations, expectations may be driven by provenances based on such things as an artifact’s age, where it was found, its use, and the culture to which it belonged, and illusory perceptions of writing may then occur in line with these expectations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The available means of production may influence the level of complexity that a writing system can tolerate. For example, the increase in complexity from Oracle to Bronze periods may have occurred because turtle plastrons and ox scapular are relatively difficult to carve on, while writing on soft clay moulds is substantially easier [12,48]. Social factors have also influenced the evolution of written Chinese.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may well have been a function of the different writing supports. Bones and scapular are relatively difficult to carve on, while bronze inscriptions were cast from writing on soft clay moulds [12,48]. To our knowledge, however, there are no large scale quantitative analyses supporting the claim that Chinese characters have either simplified or complexified over time.…”
Section: The Changing Face Of Chinese Writingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A középkori iszlám írástudásra írnoki és papi jelenségként 14 Lásd például: Arlinghaus 2006, Britnell 1997, Clanchy 1993, Petrucci 1992, Pryce 2006, Schofield 196815 A kivétel Atiyeh (2005, de a szakmunkák többsége a modern időkre fókuszál. 16 Lásd: Dallal 2010, Hill 1994, Iqbal 2009, Masood 2009, Saliba 2007, Turner 1997. A tárgykör hatalmas bibliográfiájáért lásd Abattouy (2007).…”
Section: Táblázat: a Kelet Információtechnológiai Pontszámaiunclassified