2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-51133-7_80
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Abstract.A vision for the Operator 4.0 is presented in this paper in the context of human cyber-physical systems and adaptive automation towards humanautomation symbiosis work systems for a socially sustainable manufacturing workforce. Discussions include base concepts and enabling technologies for the development of human-automation symbiosis work systems in Industry 4.0.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
215
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 324 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
215
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work further built on the concept of collaboration to transform it into a real symbiosis, in which human workers and artificial systems dynamically adapt to each other and cooperate to achieve common goals (Romero, Bernus, Noran, Stahre, & Fast-Berglund, 2016). According to this view, machines and algorithms become the means for workers to continue to work instead of being replaced (Ferreira, Doltsinis, & Lohse, 2014); means to accommodate issues related to ageing (Peruzzini & Pellicciari, 2016), disabilities or inexperience (Romero, Noran, Stahre, Bernus, & Fast-Berglund, 2015) and increase skill match, comfort and wellbeing (Fiasche, Pinzone, Fantini, Alexandru, & Taisch, 2016) .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work further built on the concept of collaboration to transform it into a real symbiosis, in which human workers and artificial systems dynamically adapt to each other and cooperate to achieve common goals (Romero, Bernus, Noran, Stahre, & Fast-Berglund, 2016). According to this view, machines and algorithms become the means for workers to continue to work instead of being replaced (Ferreira, Doltsinis, & Lohse, 2014); means to accommodate issues related to ageing (Peruzzini & Pellicciari, 2016), disabilities or inexperience (Romero, Noran, Stahre, Bernus, & Fast-Berglund, 2015) and increase skill match, comfort and wellbeing (Fiasche, Pinzone, Fantini, Alexandru, & Taisch, 2016) .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the adaptive automation movement in the design of industrial information systems (Kay, 2006), the human physical tasks are increasingly being allocated to the machines. Still, the HPE will require "human-in-the-loop" control models that will necessitate increased cognitive abilities with aid of intelligent human-machine interfaces (Romero, Bernus, Noran, Stahre, & Fast-Berglund, 2016). Smart factory supervision will demand higher cognitive workloads (Villani et al, 2017).…”
Section: Human Cognitive Efficiency (Hce)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 EVOLUTION OF THE ROLE OF FRONT-LINE OPERATOR OVER TIME According to Romero et al [2], the role of the operator in production has changed following the industrial revolutions that have taken place over the time, as shown in Fig. 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each industrial revolution is characterized by an increasing degree of complexity of the technologies involved and by a different role of the front-line operator who works with them. The Operator 1.0 generation is defined in [2] as "humans conducting manual and dextrous work with the support from mechanical tools and manually operated machine tools". The Operator 2.0 performs "assisted work" with the support of computer tools (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%