2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10029-006-0174-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The omentum–polypropylene sandwich technique: an attractive method to repair large abdominal-wall defects in the presence of contamination or infection

Abstract: The omental sandwich technique is an attractive method to repair large abdominal wall defects in the presence of contamination or overt infection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difficulty in defining the margins of the fascial defect, the weakness of the involved structures, the involvement of a bone element and lack of surgical experience are all taken into consideration during surgical planning. Bleichrodt et al used omentum polypropylene sandwich in presence of infection with good results [11]. Very less literature is available on using sandwich technique for repair of lumbar hernia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty in defining the margins of the fascial defect, the weakness of the involved structures, the involvement of a bone element and lack of surgical experience are all taken into consideration during surgical planning. Bleichrodt et al used omentum polypropylene sandwich in presence of infection with good results [11]. Very less literature is available on using sandwich technique for repair of lumbar hernia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For repair of lumbar hernia, very less literature is available on using sandwich technique. [12] In our case, we have provided strength to the defect by new technique of sandwiching two prolene mesh between layers of abdomen and got good result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other authors have reported fistula rates as high as 75% [33]. Some authors report success in lowering fistula and mesh (PP) infection rates by placement of omentum between the bowel and the mesh in contaminated abdominal wall defects caused by necrotizing fasciitis after radical debridement [35]. Because of these complications, the placement of nonabsorbable synthetic mesh in the setting of an active infection usually is a temporary measure, and the mesh is removed prior to definitive fascia-to-fascia closure.…”
Section: Non-absorbable Synthetic Meshmentioning
confidence: 99%