1955
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(55)95102-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nutritional Merits of Pelleting Calf Starters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1955
1955
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the organic matter and crude protein digestibility in calves fed with PS and TS were higher than MS ( Table 2 ). Calves fed with TS and PS consumed more DMI and gained more weight compared to calves receiving MS. Lassiter et al (1955) , Gardner (1967) , and Kertz et al (1979) all have reported that calves consume less starter of fine particle size than of large particle size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the organic matter and crude protein digestibility in calves fed with PS and TS were higher than MS ( Table 2 ). Calves fed with TS and PS consumed more DMI and gained more weight compared to calves receiving MS. Lassiter et al (1955) , Gardner (1967) , and Kertz et al (1979) all have reported that calves consume less starter of fine particle size than of large particle size.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the ingredient and nutrient composition of their diets were not similar confounding the interpretation of results. Older papers with limited details of methods and diets (Lassiter et al, 1955;Gardner, 1967;Kertz et al, 1979) reported that starter intake and ADG was less when starters were fine meals versus pelleted fine meals or coarse particle grains as a mash or textured diet. Yet, finely ground corn is digested faster in the rumen and more completely over the total digestive tract than coarsely ground corn in dairy cattle (Remond et al, 2004) and in piglets (Healy et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…above the standard. Lassiter, Denton & Rust (1954) gave calves a mixture of aureomycin and oxytetracycline, and compared their growth rate with that of calves given aureomycin or oxytetracycline singly. There was no difference in weight gain or eficiency of food utilization between the three groups of calves, and none were significantly better than the controls.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%