2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-012-1414-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The northern Baltic Sea phytoplankton communities in 1903–1911 and 1993–2005: a comparison of historical and modern species data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
44
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Other local cyanobacterial lists were published in the past 15 years from continental parts of Europe, e.g. Slovakia, Sweden, Poland, Romania, Ukraine, Slovenia, the Netherlands, and the Czech Republic (Kaštovský et al 2010 and references therein), as well as a checklist from the Baltic Sea reporting 172 cyanobacterial species (Hällfors 2004). The Czech Republic list comprises 505 species, 392 of which are considered recently present according to Kaštovský et al 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other local cyanobacterial lists were published in the past 15 years from continental parts of Europe, e.g. Slovakia, Sweden, Poland, Romania, Ukraine, Slovenia, the Netherlands, and the Czech Republic (Kaštovský et al 2010 and references therein), as well as a checklist from the Baltic Sea reporting 172 cyanobacterial species (Hällfors 2004). The Czech Republic list comprises 505 species, 392 of which are considered recently present according to Kaštovský et al 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ICES historical plankton dataset used in this study is a dataset of plankton samples collected in the North Atlantic between 1902 and 1912, digitised from historical log books. Hällfors et al (2013) compared phytoplankton records from this 'rescued' ICES historical dataset in the Baltic Sea with contemporary phytoplankton samples, and documented compositional differences between the two time periods, potentially driven by both climate change and eutrophication. By comparing the ICES historical dataset with North Sea data from the CPR survey, we can better understand changes occurring in North Sea plankton communities pre-1950s, facilitating further exploration of the effects of large scale temperature change to the Continuous Plankton Recorder temporal coverage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their evaluation of monitoring data from the Northern Baltic Proper and the Gulf of Finland collected between 1903 and 1911, Hällfors et al (2013) noted the difficulty and limitations of comparing historical with recent data at the species level, because of advancements in the taxonomic methods. There have been numerous taxonomic revisions, including the merging or splitting of taxa, as well as new descriptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in the past, only nets with a crude, undefined mesh size were available for sample enrichment, such that smaller organisms were unpredictably lost during sieving. Thus, in the study of Hällfors et al (2013), the reported spectrum of diatoms and dinoflagellates is highly incomplete, as it includes only the few reliable and large-celled species. Furthermore, spring data were collected only in May while earlier bloom stages were neglected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation