2012
DOI: 10.1007/jhep05(2012)031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The non-SUSY baryonic branch: soft supersymmetry breaking of $ \mathcal{N} = 1 $ gauge theories

Abstract: We study a non-supersymmetric deformation of the field theory dual to the baryonic branch of Klebanov-Strassler. Using a combination of analytical (series expansions) and numerical methods we construct non-supersymmetric backgrounds that smoothly interpolate between the desired UV and IR behaviors. We calculate various observables of the field theory and propose a picture of soft breaking by gaugino masses that is consistent with the various calculations on the string side. 1 pystephen@swansea.ac.uk

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As we have explained in the previous section, in general, the ASD flux does not have to vanish in the brane-dominated region. Therefore, for sufficiently small ρ the contribution of the IR 19 A similar calculation for the conifold has been done in [57,58]. 20 The proof of this fact is identical to the (slightly more complicated) proof we presented in section 3 (see the paragraph below (3.3)), and we will not repeat it here.…”
Section: Jhep06(2014)173supporting
confidence: 52%
“…As we have explained in the previous section, in general, the ASD flux does not have to vanish in the brane-dominated region. Therefore, for sufficiently small ρ the contribution of the IR 19 A similar calculation for the conifold has been done in [57,58]. 20 The proof of this fact is identical to the (slightly more complicated) proof we presented in section 3 (see the paragraph below (3.3)), and we will not repeat it here.…”
Section: Jhep06(2014)173supporting
confidence: 52%
“…In particular, in these four dimensional and SUSY preserving examples, it is possible to encode all the information about the background (BPS equations, metric, fluxes, calibrated sub-manifolds, etc), in a set of forms defined on the space 'external' to the Minkowski coordinates. Furthermore, the SU(2) and SU(3) structures typical of these backgrounds, their associated pure spinors and forms encode in subtle ways quite common operations in QFT [19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. In this paper we complement the above mentioned study of the type IIA backgrounds associated with the wrapped D6 branes and their precise description in terms of G-structures.…”
Section: Jhep08(2014)107mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Special attention has been devoted in the literature to models in which the supergravity dual is related to the conifold and its deformations [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Among these, two classes stand out, in which a dimension-2 operator [28][29][30][31] and/or a dimension-6 operator [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] develop a vacuum expectation value (VEV) (see also [41,42]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%