1997
DOI: 10.1007/s002220050174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The non-finite presentability of IA ( F 3 ) and GL 2 (Z[ t, t −1 ])

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For n = 3, Krstić and McCool [31] showed that IA 3 is not finitely presentable. For n ≥ 4, it is also not known whether IA n is finitely presentable or not.…”
Section: Free Lie Algebras and Their Derivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For n = 3, Krstić and McCool [31] showed that IA 3 is not finitely presentable. For n ≥ 4, it is also not known whether IA n is finitely presentable or not.…”
Section: Free Lie Algebras and Their Derivationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Krstić-McCool result that T 3 is not finitely presented was proven in 1997, via completely algebraic methods [7]. It is a general fact that if the second homology of a group is not finitely generated, then the group is not finitely presented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For n = 3, Krstić and McCool [11] showed that IA 3 is not finitely presentable. For n ≥ 4, it is not known whether IA n is finitely presentable or not.…”
Section: Ia-automorphism Groupmentioning
confidence: 99%