2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4068(02)00003-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The non-existence of a utility function and the structure of non-representable preference relations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the analytical form of these functions can be explicitly given in a remarkably simple way. This sheds further light on the significance of [1] and [2], since the lexicographically decomposable chains isolated and examined in these papers do not only constitute an important class of linear orders lacking real-valued utility functions, but also turn out to be a class of linear orders admitting uncountably large families of analytically specifiable utility functions on non-Archimedean extensions of the reals. In view of the last fact, it is also possible to introduce uncountable families of utility functions for certain lexicographic products of linear orders, in particular R n , for every n > 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the analytical form of these functions can be explicitly given in a remarkably simple way. This sheds further light on the significance of [1] and [2], since the lexicographically decomposable chains isolated and examined in these papers do not only constitute an important class of linear orders lacking real-valued utility functions, but also turn out to be a class of linear orders admitting uncountably large families of analytically specifiable utility functions on non-Archimedean extensions of the reals. In view of the last fact, it is also possible to introduce uncountable families of utility functions for certain lexicographic products of linear orders, in particular R n , for every n > 2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This suggests that a utility representation for L 2 should assign to every vector of the form 0, n a value that is infinitely close to that of 0, 0 . The same argument naturally extends to encompass the class of lexicographically decomposable chains described in [2] and studied in [1]. Since these chains are isomorphic to certain lexicographic orders, and one may regard lexicographic orders as a linear arrangement of clusters of infinitely close points, it is natural to associate them with a utility function on a non-Archimedean structure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Intuitively, we may notice that, if there were a utility function representing L each vertical line should be mapped into an open interval of the real line R. However, since in the real line any family of pairwise disjoint open intervals is countable, we would not have room enough to represent the whole plane R 2 , because the set of real lines is uncountable. (For further details, see [37,44,59,60], as well as p. 73 in [61], among many other possible sources.) Remark 10.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As analyzed in Beardon et al [5] (see also Giarlotta [23,24]), there are three different classes of totally ordered structures that cannot be represented in the real line through an order-isomorphism. These classes are: (i) long chains, i.e., chains containing a subchain orderisomorphic to the first uncountable ordinal, (ii) Aronszajn chains, i.e., uncountable chains that neither are long, nor contain any uncountable representable subchain, (iii) planar chains, i.e., chains containing a subchain order-isomorphic to a non-representable subset of the lexicographic plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%