2016
DOI: 10.15803/ijnc.6.1_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Next 700 Impossibility Results in Time-Varying Graphs

Abstract: We address highly dynamic distributed systems modeled by time-varying graphs (TVGs). We interest in proof of impossibility results that often use informal arguments about convergence. First, we provide a distance among TVGs to define correctly the convergence of TVG sequences. Next, we provide a general framework that formally proves the convergence of the sequence of executions of any deterministic algorithm over TVGs of any convergent sequence of TVGs. Finally, we illustrate the relevance of the above result… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of Theorem 1 relies on a generic framework introduced by Braud-Santoni et al [5]. Note that even though this generic framework is designed for another model (namely, the classical message passing model), it is straightforward to borrow it for our current model.…”
Section: Impossibility Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proof of Theorem 1 relies on a generic framework introduced by Braud-Santoni et al [5]. Note that even though this generic framework is designed for another model (namely, the classical message passing model), it is straightforward to borrow it for our current model.…”
Section: Impossibility Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We present briefly this framework here. The interested reader is referred to the original work [5] for more details.…”
Section: Impossibility Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [11], the temporal definition above is extended to infinite lifetime networks, by requiring that the covering relation (domination or else) be satisfied infinitely often. The authors observe that whenever the network is temporally connected in a recurrent way, which corresponds to Class T C R in [7] (and Class 5 in [8]), one has the guarantee that among all the edges that appear at some point, at least a connected spanning subset of them must reappear forever [5]. In other words, an equivalent characterization of T C R is that the eventual footprint of the network (i.e., the union of those edges which reappear forever) is connected.…”
Section: Further Discussion On the Temporal Interpretation Of Robustnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying the theorem of [5], we obtain that, until time t i , the execution of A on G ω is identical to the one on G i . This implies that, executing A on G ω (of size strictly greater than 3), r 1 and r 2 only visit the nodes u, v, and w. This is contradictory with the fact that A satisfies the perpetual exploration specification on connected over time rings of size strictly greater than 3 using two robots.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%