2007
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.967772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The New Game in Town: Competitive Effects of IPOs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
76
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
14
76
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we offer new insights on the underpricing puzzle (e.g., Ritter and Welch, 2002): The higher underpricing of isolated IPOs is consistent with a myopia of actors taking part to the going public process (e.g., underwriters), who do not seem to properly take into account the LHB effect in the IPO price-setting process. Second, our findings on the asset-pricing implications of local IPOs and delistings are new to the literature and join the recent contributions by Braun andLarrain (2009), Colaco et al (2009) and Hsu et al (2010) whereby IPOs are investigated as an integrated phenomenon that interacts with the surrounding economic environment rather than as a stand-alone corporate event. Our results for delistings introduce this same integrated perspective into the ongoing public-to-private transactions debate (e.g., Renneboog and Simons, 2005;Renneboog et al, 2007;Baran and King, 2010;Achleitner et al, 2013;Boubakri et al, 2013;Fidrmuc et al, 2013;Croci and Del Giudice, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…First, we offer new insights on the underpricing puzzle (e.g., Ritter and Welch, 2002): The higher underpricing of isolated IPOs is consistent with a myopia of actors taking part to the going public process (e.g., underwriters), who do not seem to properly take into account the LHB effect in the IPO price-setting process. Second, our findings on the asset-pricing implications of local IPOs and delistings are new to the literature and join the recent contributions by Braun andLarrain (2009), Colaco et al (2009) and Hsu et al (2010) whereby IPOs are investigated as an integrated phenomenon that interacts with the surrounding economic environment rather than as a stand-alone corporate event. Our results for delistings introduce this same integrated perspective into the ongoing public-to-private transactions debate (e.g., Renneboog and Simons, 2005;Renneboog et al, 2007;Baran and King, 2010;Achleitner et al, 2013;Boubakri et al, 2013;Fidrmuc et al, 2013;Croci and Del Giudice, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…These effects are likely to be dependent on the composition of the market. Empirically, there is indeed an effect of new listings on the relative prices of the firms already in the market (Shleifer, 1986;Braun and Larrain, 2009;Hsu et al, 2010). This paper provides a joint evolution of the industrial composition of the stock market that is consistent with rational listing choices, and that generates effects on the prices of other firms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Braun & Larrain (2009) show that the intra-industry effect is stronger when the IPO is issued in markets that are less integrated internationally, when the IPO is bigger, and when the stock return of the other assets is highly correlated with that of the firm undertaking the IPO. Hsu et al (2010) revisit the topic using a sample of 4,188 completed and 1,630 withdrawn U.S. IPOs occurring between 1980 and 2001. Their main conclusion is that rival companies experience negative stock price reactions to completed IPOs in their industry, and positive stock price reactions to their withdrawal.…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the parallel studies investigating somewhat related issues focus on the impact of Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) on their listed competitors (e.g. Akhigbe, Borde & Whyte, 2003, Braun & Larrain, 2009Hsu, Reed & Rocholl, 2010;Cotei & Farhat, 2013). Yet, SMEs are very different from publicly listed companies, which justifies revisiting the topic using SME-based samples, a hardly negligible issue since these companies are the backbone of the EU's economy, generating 28% of its GDP and providing jobs for 88.8 million people in 2013 (European Commission, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%