2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000139714.09832.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The New Economics of Radical Prostatectomy: Cost Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic and Robot Assisted Techniques

Abstract: The costs of new technology are typically borne out in the first years of use and RAP is no exception with high robot costs for purchase, maintenance and operative equipment overshadowing savings gained by shorter length of stay. While RRP is currently the least costly approach, LRP has proved to be almost as cost competitive as RRP, whereas RAP will require a significant decrease in the cost of the device and maintenance fees.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
157
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
157
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Two studies have reported higher costs during hospital stay for RALP compared with RRP [1,2], whereas another study has suggested lower total costs for RALP, although higher direct costs [3]. A valid comparison of the costs for the two techniques cannot be done, because the calculations are based on different models [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two studies have reported higher costs during hospital stay for RALP compared with RRP [1,2], whereas another study has suggested lower total costs for RALP, although higher direct costs [3]. A valid comparison of the costs for the two techniques cannot be done, because the calculations are based on different models [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The equipment is expensive and the operating time is, at least during the learning period, longer than in radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). It is hoped that these costs will be outweighed by savings due to shorter postoperative hospital care, reduced number of blood transfusions, less need for postoperative analgesics [1,2,4,5] and shorter sick leave.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the large number of men with prostate cancer, the effects of treatment have major public health implications, including patient counseling and financial costs. The existing studies comparing the costs of robotic and open radical prostatectomy, however, are limited in their scope, addressing only the costs of the procedure and initial hospital stay[40,41,42]. These studies do not consider subsequent costs from complications, treatment of side effects, or cancer recurrence, which may be substantial in this patient population.…”
Section: Comparison and Discussion Of Orp And Ralpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cost studies by Lotan et al, Mouraviev et al, Scales et al, and Bolenz et al specifically compared RALP with ORP and reported higher operative costs with RALP, although comparisons were restricted to the costs of the procedure and the duration of initial hospitalization[40,41,42,43]. Scales et al reported that inpatient costs of RALP are volume dependent and that cost equivalence with ORP is possible at high-volume specialty centers; however, they do not report actual cost data[42].…”
Section: Comparison and Discussion Of Orp And Ralpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cost-analyses from a urological perspective have focused exclusively on the robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy model. [95][96][97][98][99][100] However, some extrapolations are still possible. When Computer Motion, Inc., initially merged with Intuitive Surgical, Inc., in 2003, the cost of the da Vinci system was slightly higher than US$1 000 000.…”
Section: The Futurementioning
confidence: 99%