2016
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0256
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neural basis of depth perception from motion parallax

Abstract: One contribution of 15 to a theme issue 'Vision in our three-dimensional world'. In addition to depth cues afforded by binocular vision, the brain processes relative motion signals to perceive depth. When an observer translates relative to their visual environment, the relative motion of objects at different distances (motion parallax) provides a powerful cue to three-dimensional scene structure. Although perception of depth based on motion parallax has been studied extensively in humans, relatively little is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, although some monocular cues (e.g. occlusion, relative size) can contribute to depth perception (Cutting, 1997;Hillis, Watt, Landy, & Banks, 2004), such pictorial cues generally do not provide precise quantitative information about depth (Kim, Angelaki, & DeAngelis, 2016). Stereovision (also referred to as binocular vision or stereoscopic vision) then maximises the number and nature of visual cues, and increases the presence (Craig, 2013;Howard, 2012) and embodiment (Kilteni et al, 2012) of participants interacting with a VE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, although some monocular cues (e.g. occlusion, relative size) can contribute to depth perception (Cutting, 1997;Hillis, Watt, Landy, & Banks, 2004), such pictorial cues generally do not provide precise quantitative information about depth (Kim, Angelaki, & DeAngelis, 2016). Stereovision (also referred to as binocular vision or stereoscopic vision) then maximises the number and nature of visual cues, and increases the presence (Craig, 2013;Howard, 2012) and embodiment (Kilteni et al, 2012) of participants interacting with a VE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cortical visual processing network includes dorsal and ventral pathways. The middle temporal gyrus is a key node in the dorsal pathway, which involves in visuospatial functions and visual motion [29][30][31] . The middle frontal gyrus and superior frontal gyrus take part in the oculomotor control, which is closely related to dorsal and ventral pathways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cells based on their disparity and speed tuning, which may differ from cells with same name reported in existing physiological studies. For example, the properties of congruent and opposite cells shown by Nadler et al (2013) and Kim et al (2016) are based on the consistency between depth tuning and motion parallax during self-motion with eye movements. Because we do not model eye movements and our viewing geometry differs from that of Nadler et al (2013) and Kim et al (2016), we caution against direct comparisons between the cell populations unless evidence is produced to substantiate such a connection.…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the properties of congruent and opposite cells shown by Nadler et al (2013) and Kim et al (2016) are based on the consistency between depth tuning and motion parallax during self-motion with eye movements. Because we do not model eye movements and our viewing geometry differs from that of Nadler et al (2013) and Kim et al (2016), we caution against direct comparisons between the cell populations unless evidence is produced to substantiate such a connection. Figure 3, a and b, shows that the suppression drops off as tuning in any particular dimension becomes more dissimilar among units that share RFs in the same visuotopic region of the visual field (i.e., in the same MTϪ/MSTv macrocolumn).…”
Section: Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%