2021
DOI: 10.1111/glob.12317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The networked character of migration and transnationalism

Abstract: Acknowledgement of the prominent role of social networks in migration studies marked a significant departure from earlier studies, suggesting that social networks determine migration decisions, trajectories, and outcomes. While social network analytical tools have not always been used in empirical investigations of migratory phenomena, studies on migration that use relational approaches also show an inherent network thinking. In this paper, we review the state of the art of the literature on migration and soci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
2
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although network mechanisms and their associated vocabulary were always present in migration research, in their empirical investigations, migration scholars are often criticized as being disconnected from or a latecomer to the tools of social network analysis (Bilecen et al., 2018; Dahinden, 2016; Eve, 2010; Krissman, 2005). Nonetheless, networks are very much at the core of migration research, particularly when addressing initiation of migration, settlement, and migrants’ transnational practices, which connect a variety of countries and regions (Bilecen & Lubbers, in press). The majority of such research is concerned with integration/assimilation patterns of international migrants in the host societies (e.g., Gordon, 1964; Nee & Sanders, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although network mechanisms and their associated vocabulary were always present in migration research, in their empirical investigations, migration scholars are often criticized as being disconnected from or a latecomer to the tools of social network analysis (Bilecen et al., 2018; Dahinden, 2016; Eve, 2010; Krissman, 2005). Nonetheless, networks are very much at the core of migration research, particularly when addressing initiation of migration, settlement, and migrants’ transnational practices, which connect a variety of countries and regions (Bilecen & Lubbers, in press). The majority of such research is concerned with integration/assimilation patterns of international migrants in the host societies (e.g., Gordon, 1964; Nee & Sanders, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Summing up, the application of social network analysis to studies of international mobility and transnationalism sheds light on the relationships that are embedded in these processes and their outcomes (Bilecen & Lubbers, 2021). Thus, we argue that, by studying the composition of personal networks that make up this corridor, paying special attention to migratory capital, and by studying social network structure to measure individuals' degree of structural embeddedness in TSFs, we can not only refine the understanding of international mobility patterns, but also contribute knowledge about the clustering of mobility levels in networks.…”
Section: Structural Embeddedness In the Tsfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Migrants are often embedded in and negotiate longdistance ties of different forms of transnational relationships across countries (Bilecen & Lubbers, 2021). Among their transnational experiences and practices are relationships between family members living in the sending and receiving countries, as an existential form of familyhood over time and space (Baldassar & Merla, 2014).…”
Section: Theoretical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%