1969
|
Sign up to set email alerts
The Nature of Hypnotic Analgesia and Placebo Response to Experimental Pain
Abstract: The effects of hypnotically induced analgesia and placebo response to "a powerful analgesic drug" were investigated. Highly motivated Ss, who were either very responsive or essentially insusceptible to hypnosis, performed a task which induced ischemic muscle pain. Special procedures and a modified double-blind condition were adopted to establish plausible expectations in both groups that the two treatments effectively reduce pain intensity. Changes in pain threshold and tolerance following hypnotic and placebo… Show more
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
266
11
8
2
Citation Types
15
95
0
1
Year Published
Range
1969
19692026
2026Publication Types
Select...
230
44
4
Relationship
2
276
Authors
Journals
Cited by 278 publications
(111 citation statements)
References 23 publications
15
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…We conceived this result assuming that hypnosis disrupted the upper-mentioned significant associations found in waking condition. This result supports previous findings suggesting that placebo and hypnosis involve, at least to some extent, different processes of top-down regulation [ 19 ]. This observation also corroborates our previously reported pain-hypnosis ERP findings [ 31 ]…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The present results extend current findings on hypnotic modulation of brain activity in a nonclinical sample [ 31 , 33 , 157 , 158 ] and support the view that the effects of placebo and hypnosis on pain relief are, at least to some extent, separate processes [ 19 , 27 , 32 – 35 ]. However, it is important to underline that current source findings are purely speculative and must be considered with caution, since they were obtained using only 30 scalp electrodes and the modeling is based on a standard head model (instead of individual MRI data).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…We found that higher pain expectation was associated with higher levels of pain reduction through placebo treatment in waking condition, but during hypnosis this association was under the significance level. We thought that this observation supports the hypothesis that placebo analgesia in waking and hypnosis reflects two different top-down processes [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 85%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…We conceived this result assuming that hypnosis disrupted the upper-mentioned significant associations found in waking condition. This result supports previous findings suggesting that placebo and hypnosis involve, at least to some extent, different processes of top-down regulation [ 19 ]. This observation also corroborates our previously reported pain-hypnosis ERP findings [ 31 ]…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The present results extend current findings on hypnotic modulation of brain activity in a nonclinical sample [ 31 , 33 , 157 , 158 ] and support the view that the effects of placebo and hypnosis on pain relief are, at least to some extent, separate processes [ 19 , 27 , 32 – 35 ]. However, it is important to underline that current source findings are purely speculative and must be considered with caution, since they were obtained using only 30 scalp electrodes and the modeling is based on a standard head model (instead of individual MRI data).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…We found that higher pain expectation was associated with higher levels of pain reduction through placebo treatment in waking condition, but during hypnosis this association was under the significance level. We thought that this observation supports the hypothesis that placebo analgesia in waking and hypnosis reflects two different top-down processes [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 85%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The inquiry also revealed that some of the low hypnotizable simulator subjects felt the analgesia suggestion was helpful. This finding, although impossible to quantify within this study, is remarkably similar to the McGlashan et al (1969) finding that some insusceptible subjects responded to an analgesia suggestion but that their subjective ratings did not show a corresponding change in objective performance.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 85%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The results suggest that hypnosis and VRD involve different mechanisms. They also replicate the earlier results that hypnotic analgesia is more than simply a placebo (demonstrated by an absence of an interaction between treatment condition and hypnotizability; Hilgard & Hilgard, 1975; McGlashan et al, 1969).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 84%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…We conceived this result assuming that hypnosis disrupted the upper-mentioned significant associations found in waking condition. This result supports previous findings suggesting that placebo and hypnosis involve, at least to some extent, different processes of top-down regulation [ 19 ]. This observation also corroborates our previously reported pain-hypnosis ERP findings [ 31 ]…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The present results extend current findings on hypnotic modulation of brain activity in a nonclinical sample [ 31 , 33 , 157 , 158 ] and support the view that the effects of placebo and hypnosis on pain relief are, at least to some extent, separate processes [ 19 , 27 , 32 – 35 ]. However, it is important to underline that current source findings are purely speculative and must be considered with caution, since they were obtained using only 30 scalp electrodes and the modeling is based on a standard head model (instead of individual MRI data).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…We found that higher pain expectation was associated with higher levels of pain reduction through placebo treatment in waking condition, but during hypnosis this association was under the significance level. We thought that this observation supports the hypothesis that placebo analgesia in waking and hypnosis reflects two different top-down processes [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 85%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The inquiry also revealed that some of the low hypnotizable simulator subjects felt the analgesia suggestion was helpful. This finding, although impossible to quantify within this study, is remarkably similar to the McGlashan et al (1969) finding that some insusceptible subjects responded to an analgesia suggestion but that their subjective ratings did not show a corresponding change in objective performance.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 85%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The results suggest that hypnosis and VRD involve different mechanisms. They also replicate the earlier results that hypnotic analgesia is more than simply a placebo (demonstrated by an absence of an interaction between treatment condition and hypnotizability; Hilgard & Hilgard, 1975; McGlashan et al, 1969).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 84%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…We conceived this result assuming that hypnosis disrupted the upper-mentioned significant associations found in waking condition. This result supports previous findings suggesting that placebo and hypnosis involve, at least to some extent, different processes of top-down regulation [ 19 ]. This observation also corroborates our previously reported pain-hypnosis ERP findings [ 31 ]…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The present results extend current findings on hypnotic modulation of brain activity in a nonclinical sample [ 31 , 33 , 157 , 158 ] and support the view that the effects of placebo and hypnosis on pain relief are, at least to some extent, separate processes [ 19 , 27 , 32 – 35 ]. However, it is important to underline that current source findings are purely speculative and must be considered with caution, since they were obtained using only 30 scalp electrodes and the modeling is based on a standard head model (instead of individual MRI data).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…We found that higher pain expectation was associated with higher levels of pain reduction through placebo treatment in waking condition, but during hypnosis this association was under the significance level. We thought that this observation supports the hypothesis that placebo analgesia in waking and hypnosis reflects two different top-down processes [ 19 ].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 85%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The inquiry also revealed that some of the low hypnotizable simulator subjects felt the analgesia suggestion was helpful. This finding, although impossible to quantify within this study, is remarkably similar to the McGlashan et al (1969) finding that some insusceptible subjects responded to an analgesia suggestion but that their subjective ratings did not show a corresponding change in objective performance.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 85%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The results suggest that hypnosis and VRD involve different mechanisms. They also replicate the earlier results that hypnotic analgesia is more than simply a placebo (demonstrated by an absence of an interaction between treatment condition and hypnotizability; Hilgard & Hilgard, 1975; McGlashan et al, 1969).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 84%