Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia 2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59259-412-2_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Natural History of CLL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Thus, already anticipating what should be the conclusion of these reflections, we submit that, in our view, there is currently not enough evidence to affirm that the so-called CD5-negative CLL exists as a "variant," "atypical," or a "subset" of CLL. In effect, although we do not take the position of asserting once and for all that CD5-negative CLL does not represent a variant of the classical CD5 + CLL, we believe there is room for the hypothesis that this entity could be another kind of B-cell lymphoma not biologically related to bona fide CLL and, therefore, belonging to another, yet unknown, category of diseases (Marti & Zenger, 2010;Sheikh et al, 2002). Unfortunately, the results of the comparison between classic CD5 + CLL and CD5-negative CLL with regard to clinical aspects, hematological parameters, disease stage, and survival are not sufficiently conclusive to allow us to state, at least preliminarily, that CD5-negative CLL is a distinct clinical entity (Demir et al, 2017).…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 Thus, already anticipating what should be the conclusion of these reflections, we submit that, in our view, there is currently not enough evidence to affirm that the so-called CD5-negative CLL exists as a "variant," "atypical," or a "subset" of CLL. In effect, although we do not take the position of asserting once and for all that CD5-negative CLL does not represent a variant of the classical CD5 + CLL, we believe there is room for the hypothesis that this entity could be another kind of B-cell lymphoma not biologically related to bona fide CLL and, therefore, belonging to another, yet unknown, category of diseases (Marti & Zenger, 2010;Sheikh et al, 2002). Unfortunately, the results of the comparison between classic CD5 + CLL and CD5-negative CLL with regard to clinical aspects, hematological parameters, disease stage, and survival are not sufficiently conclusive to allow us to state, at least preliminarily, that CD5-negative CLL is a distinct clinical entity (Demir et al, 2017).…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 81%
“…With respect to the CD5 antigen, almost 100% of the participants considered it "required," although a small percentage (less than 5%) classified it only as "suggested" or "recommended," which would exclude our case from receiving the diagnosis of CLL (Rawstron et al, 2018. See also Marti & Zenger, 2010;Romano et al, 2015). Suppose now that our hypothetical patient undergoes additional multidisciplinary studies because his physician is not sure about the diagnosis.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%