1933
DOI: 10.1001/archneurpsyc.1933.02240180070004
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

The Myth of the Occipitofrontal Association Tract

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
41
1
1
0

Citation Types

0
5
0
0

Year Published

Range
1935
1935
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
32
7
4

Relationship

0
43

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 43 publications

(5 citation statements)
references

References 2 publications

0
5
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The association between the FOF and the FPP was already proposed by Rosett (1933). Due to the close apposition of the FOF to the internal capsule radiation, the FOF was considered to be a part of that radiation in several classical studies (for review, see .…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…According to its topographical position (medial to the internal capsule and lateral to the ventricular angle), this bundle corresponds to the FOF as described in the adult human brain by both classical (Obersteiner and Redlich 1902;Von Monakow 1905) and modern authors (Schmahmann and Pandya 2006;Makris et al 2007). The associative nature of this bundle has remained contestable for almost a century (for review, see Rosett 1933;Aralasmak et al 2006;, but recent studies confirmed that the FOF really is an associative pathway Makris et al 2007). …”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation