1993
DOI: 10.1006/zjls.1993.1024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The monophyly of the Characidiinae, a Neotropical group of characiform fishes (Teleostei: Ostariophysi)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
211
3
46

Year Published

1993
1993
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(276 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
16
211
3
46
Order By: Relevance
“…1-3). Also, in many significant past papers the genus Brycon was considered "primitive", "generalized" or phylogenetically basal in the Neotropical Characiformes, or at least in relation to the Characidae, sharing several osteological features with basal African groups (see Weitzman, 1962;Buckup, 1998;Mirande, 2009Mirande, , 2010Weitzman, 2003 andOliveira et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1-3). Also, in many significant past papers the genus Brycon was considered "primitive", "generalized" or phylogenetically basal in the Neotropical Characiformes, or at least in relation to the Characidae, sharing several osteological features with basal African groups (see Weitzman, 1962;Buckup, 1998;Mirande, 2009Mirande, , 2010Weitzman, 2003 andOliveira et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The species Characidium zebra is considered morphologically basal in the phylogeny of Characidium, presenting several plesiomorphic characters (Buckup, 1993). In that sense, the karyotype of this species could also be characterized as basal for the group under study and chromosome variations observed in the other species could be explained by the occurrence of several structural chromosome rearrangements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phylogenetic position of this group has recently changed, since Characidiinae was considered a member of Hemiodontidae, a subfamily of Characidae, and also an independent family. A cladistic analysis suggested that Characidiinae and Crenuchinae belong to the monophyletic family Crenuchidae (Buckup, 1998). Cytogenetic studies in this group are scarce, recent, and limited to some species of the genus Characidium (Miyazawa & Galetti Jr., 1994;Maistro et al, 1998Maistro et al, , 2004Centofante et al, 2001Centofante et al, , 2003Silva & Maistro, 2006;Vicari et al, 2008;Noleto et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The African citharinids have been commonly considered in both morphological and molecular analyses as basal characiforms (Vari, 1979;Ortí & Meyer, 1997;Buckup, 1998;Calcagnotto et al, 2005). The spermatic characteristics of chromatin condensation found in citharinids (Mattei et al, 1995) is similar to that found in Chanos chanos, a gonorynchiform (Gwo et al, 1995), sister group of the Otophysi, and in Olivaichthys mesembrinus, Diplomystidae (Quagio-Grassiotto et al, 2001b), the most basal family in Siluriformes, and may represent a primitive state of the character that remains in some representatives of characiforms, including serrasalmines, Salminus, Brycon, stevardiines, anostomids, prochilodontids, and cynodontids.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%