1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1212(199807/08)8:4<280::aid-oa428>3.0.co;2-j
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
The molecular palaeoecology of geese: identification of archaeological goose remains using ancient DNA analysis
Abstract: The remains of six species of geese are commonly recovered from archaeological sites in Britain dating from the Saxon and later periods. However, identification of this material to species level is hampered by a lack of morphological variation and a large overlap in size. To address this issue we obtained DNA sequence data for a section of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene from modern samples of each species, and successfully identified several DNA markers for Branta species. No markers were found within the…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
6
2
0
0
Citation Types
0
7
0
0
Year Published
2000
2024
Publication Types
Select...
7
1
Relationship
0
8
Authors
Journals
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
References 34 publications
0
7
0
0
“…The preliminary study of ancient geese DNA mentioned previously (Barnes et al 1998) postulated a possible correlation between the minimum shaft diameter of goose bone and DNA recovery. Our lack of any correlation in this respect, is encouraging, since it indicates that the extraction (and subsequent identification) of DNA from the bones of smaller geese species (e.g.…”
Section: Dna Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preliminary study of ancient geese DNA mentioned previously (Barnes et al 1998) postulated a possible correlation between the minimum shaft diameter of goose bone and DNA recovery. Our lack of any correlation in this respect, is encouraging, since it indicates that the extraction (and subsequent identification) of DNA from the bones of smaller geese species (e.g.…”
Section: Dna Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Until recently, some studies have utilized the denaturant to dissolve more than 90% of barnacle cement through the physical disruption of non-covalent interaction combined with chemical cleavage of some covalent linkages in barnacle cement protein. [18][19][20] The main components of barnacle cement are proteins, which account for about 90% of total barnacle cement. The rest of the components include carbohydrate (1%), lipid (1%) and inorganic ash (4%), among which 30% of inorganic ash is calcium.…”
Section: The Compositional Characteristics Of Barnacle Cementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barnacle cement is a polyprotein complex secreted by barnacle, which makes the barnacle to firmly adhere on various substantial surfaces under the water 17 . Until recently, some studies have utilized the denaturant to dissolve more than 90% of barnacle cement through the physical disruption of non‐covalent interaction combined with chemical cleavage of some covalent linkages in barnacle cement protein 18–20 . The main components of barnacle cement are proteins, which account for about 90% of total barnacle cement.…”
Section: The Compositional Characteristics Of Barnacle Cementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cytochrome b gene has been used for species identification in an archaeological context (e.g. (Barnes et al, 1998;Loreille et al, 1997;Poulakakis, 2006;Yang et al, 2004)). Sequences were obtained from two different regions within the cytochrome b gene (70 bp: Basel, 100 bp: Copenhagen).…”
Section: Genetic Identification Of Species and Mitochondrial Haplogroupmentioning
confidence: 99%
