2011
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.93.1159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The millipede genus Caucasodesmus Golovatch, 1985, with the description of a new species from the Crimea, Ukraine (Polydesmida, Diplopoda, Trichopolydesmidae)

Abstract: The hitherto monotypic genus Caucasodesmus is new to the Ukrainian list due to the discovery of Caucasodesmus tauricus sp. n. in a cave in the Crimea. The new species is easily distinguished from Caucasodesmus inexpectatus Golovatch, 1985, the type, and only other, known species of this genus, in the abundantly setose collum and following metaterga, and more elaborate gonopods. The status of Caucasodesmus, which shows in the superfamily Trichopolydesmoidea where it definitely belongs such evident generic-level… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Somatic characters such as the number of body segments (19 in the male or in both sexes, or 20 in both sexes), the pore formula (always normal, but can be a little abbreviated on the last 1–2 segments before the telson: 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15–17(18,19)), the degree of development of paraterga (usually moderate, often small, but never really well-developed and strongly flattened dorsally), the position of the ozopores (usually open flush dorsally near the caudal corner of pore-bearing paraterga), the shape of tergal setae (short and clavate to very long and bacilliform), the presence of modifications on male legs 2 (enlarged in Bactrodesmus ) and on the male head (ranging sporadically from nothing to a strong, central bulge or a mushroom-like or bulbous tubercle), they all are considered here as species-specific. This situation agrees with general wisdom derived from other tropical faunas (Golovatch 1994, Golovatch et al 2014). …”
Section: A Generic Reclassification Of Afrotropical Trichopolydesmidaesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Somatic characters such as the number of body segments (19 in the male or in both sexes, or 20 in both sexes), the pore formula (always normal, but can be a little abbreviated on the last 1–2 segments before the telson: 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15–17(18,19)), the degree of development of paraterga (usually moderate, often small, but never really well-developed and strongly flattened dorsally), the position of the ozopores (usually open flush dorsally near the caudal corner of pore-bearing paraterga), the shape of tergal setae (short and clavate to very long and bacilliform), the presence of modifications on male legs 2 (enlarged in Bactrodesmus ) and on the male head (ranging sporadically from nothing to a strong, central bulge or a mushroom-like or bulbous tubercle), they all are considered here as species-specific. This situation agrees with general wisdom derived from other tropical faunas (Golovatch 1994, Golovatch et al 2014). …”
Section: A Generic Reclassification Of Afrotropical Trichopolydesmidaesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Golovatch (1992, 1994) provided an evolutionary scenario for the genera of Trichopolydesmidae (= Fuhrmannodesmidae) known from South America, accepting as the basalmost those genera showing rather small, narrowly fused 1 , subglobose gonopodal coxae that form no significant gonocoel in which to hinge the largely exposed, usually rather complex and elongate telopodites. Amongst the Afrotropical trichopolydesmids such are the genera Elgonicola , Heterosphaeroparia , Megaloparia , and Sphaeroparia (Figs 1D, 2A, 1B, and 1A, respectively).…”
Section: A Generic Reclassification Of Afrotropical Trichopolydesmidaementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, a gonopod-based diagnosis of Trichopolydesmidae is still not entirely satisfactory (Simonsen 1990, Golovatch 2011, 2013). This family appears to unite the micropolydesmoids in which the gonopod coxae are subglobose, from rather small to very large, while the prefemoral part is often orientated transversely to the body axis, usually extending fully mesally across the coxae.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%