1948
DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1948.00690040026003
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

The Middle Ear in Sound Conduction

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
86
7
4
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

1950
1950
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
86
6
3

Relationship

0
95

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 95 publications

(28 citation statements)
references

References 2 publications

1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The present study confirms and extends the previous examinations of neurophysiologic responses of RW stimulation that had demonstrated CM, CAP, and ABR responses similar to responses generated with acoustic stimulation (23,25,43). The technology achieving RW stimulation differed in these cases; however, electrocochleographic responses were shown to be at least qualitatively similar.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…It is generally accepted that the most effective input to the cochlea is the difference between the pressures at the RW and OW (43,49). However, if this was strictly true, then when the RW or OW was occluded, the results should be a vast reduction in the efficacy of mechanical stimulation of the inner ear via the OW or RW, respectively.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The present study confirms and extends the previous examinations of neurophysiologic responses of RW stimulation that had demonstrated CM, CAP, and ABR responses similar to responses generated with acoustic stimulation (23,25,43). The technology achieving RW stimulation differed in these cases; however, electrocochleographic responses were shown to be at least qualitatively similar.…”
Section: Results
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…It is generally accepted that the most effective input to the cochlea is the difference between the pressures at the RW and OW (43,49). However, if this was strictly true, then when the RW or OW was occluded, the results should be a vast reduction in the efficacy of mechanical stimulation of the inner ear via the OW or RW, respectively.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The chainÕs importance to hearing is demonstrated by its interruption, which in human ears, introduces a 60 dB hearing loss (Peake et al, 1992). Similar reductions have been reported in other species [e.g., Wever et al (1948) in cat]. Clearly, ossicular sound transmission is important to normal hearing function .…”
Section: The Structure and Function Of Ossicular Chains
mentioning
confidence: 63%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Numerous studies in animals and human beings have detailed the degree of hearing loss associated with varying size and location of tympanic membrane perforations. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] Otolaryngologists' clinical experience with PE tubes for nearly 40 years has confirmed these findings. This article documents that PE tubes, by themselves, can result in significant conductive hearing loss.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 82%