The MARS for Squat, Countermovement, and Standing Long Jump Performance Analyses

Abstract

Jump tests are often used to assess the effect of interventions because their outcomes are reported valid indicators of functional performance. In this study, we examined the reproducibility of performance parameters from 3 common jump tests obtained using the commercially available Kistler Measurement, Analysis and Reporting Software (MARS). On 2 separate days, 32 men performed 3 squat jumps (SJs), 3 countermovement jumps (CMJs), and 3 standing long jumps (LJs) on a Kistler force-plate. On both days, the performance measures from the best jump of each series were extracted using the MARS. Changes in the mean scores, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and coefficients of variations (CVs) were computed to quantify the between-day reproducibility of each parameter. Moreover, the reproducibility quantifiers specific to the 3 separate jumps were compared using nonparametric tests. Overall, an acceptable between-day reproducibility (mean ± SD, ICC, and CV) of SJ (0.88 ± 0.06 and 7.1 ± 3.8%), CMJ (0.84 ± 0.17 and 5.9 ± 4.1%), and LJ (0.80 ± 0.13 and 8.1 ± 4.1%) measures was found using the MARS, except for parameters directly relating to the rate of force development (i.e., time to maximal force) and change in momentum during countermovement (i.e., negative force impulse) where reproducibility was lower. A greater proportion of the performance measures from the standing LJs had low ICCs and/or high CVs values most likely owing to the complex nature of the LJ test. Practitioners and researchers can use most of the jump test parameters from the MARS with confidence to quantify changes in the functional ability of individuals over time, except for those relating to the rate of force development or change in momentum during countermovement phases of jumps.

Clinical Implications of Hand Position and Lower Limb Length Measurement Method on Y-Balance Test Scores and Interpretations

“…In future studies, researchers may seek to compare the kinematics of the LQ-YBT using the 2 hand positions to better understand the movement control of this task. Restricting upper limb motion during functional performance testing is believed to provide a more specific assessment of lower limb function, 15,30 whereas permitting upper limb motion is believed to be more natural and functional. 31,32 I cannot recommend using 1 protocol over another because the clinical aims need to be considered.…”

Reliability and validity of the Myotest® for measuring running stride kinematics

“…The absolute reliability and validity of measures were considered adequate when the corresponding CV values were equal to or lower than 10% (Hébert-Losier & Beaven, 2014;Holsgaard Larsen, Caserotti, Puggaard, & Aagaard, 2007;Stokes, 1985). All statistical analyses were performed using SigmaStat for Windows 3.5 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) and Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corp., Redmont, WA, USA) with a level of significance set at α ≤ 0.05.…”

Using data from the Microsoft Kinect 2 to determine postural stability in healthy subjects: A feasibility trial

“…In order to assess the reliability of data recorded from the MK2, a Kistler Type 9260AA force plate (KFP) was used as a research-grade comparison. The KFP uses piezoelectric force sensors to accurately measure any forces applied to the surface of the device [ 25 ]. The intention of this study was to assess seated balance using the KFP and the MK2.…”