2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2009.00815.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The management of mandibular body fractures in young children

Abstract: -This article reviews the management of mandibular body fractures in young children. Treatment principles of this fracture type differ from that of adults due to concerns regarding mandibular growth processes and dentition development. The goal of this fracture treatment is to restore the underlying bony architecture to its preinjury position in a stable fashion as non-invasively as possible and with minimal residual esthetic and functional impairment. The management of mandibular body fractures in children de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
76
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of an arch bar and wire, followed by intermaxillary fixation, is an option for treatment of such fractures. [26][27][28] Disadvantages of arch bar intermaxillary fixation include an unacceptably high glove perforation rate associated with arch bar placement, risk of blood-borne pathogen infection in maxillofacial trauma, need for general anesthesia to place the arch bars, the effects of the arch bar on dental enamel and gingiva, increased discomfort, prolonged treatment, poor oral hygiene, and the likelihood of gingival injury. 6,28 The orthodontic bracketing that we used offers an acceptable and less threatening procedure to a pediatric patient and resulted in high patient comfort and acceptance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of an arch bar and wire, followed by intermaxillary fixation, is an option for treatment of such fractures. [26][27][28] Disadvantages of arch bar intermaxillary fixation include an unacceptably high glove perforation rate associated with arch bar placement, risk of blood-borne pathogen infection in maxillofacial trauma, need for general anesthesia to place the arch bars, the effects of the arch bar on dental enamel and gingiva, increased discomfort, prolonged treatment, poor oral hygiene, and the likelihood of gingival injury. 6,28 The orthodontic bracketing that we used offers an acceptable and less threatening procedure to a pediatric patient and resulted in high patient comfort and acceptance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the mandible has the capacity to heal rapidly in the early years of life, as the high osteogenic potential of the bone, large medullary space, and thick periosteum enable rapid consolidation and remodeling at a fracture site. 1,2 The immobilization time should thus be minimized to 2 to 3 weeks. 3 In the present patient, we left the occlusal splint in situ for 3 weeks, as recommended in reports of similar patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mock surgery also needs to achieve proper reduction before acrylic splint fabrication (4,6). It may need more time while the laboratory working done.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, more conservative approach, such as minimal manipulation without affecting functional impairment, is mandatory in children (4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%