The management of lower back pain using pilates method: assessment of content exercise reporting in RCTs

Barros, Brenison Souza de; Imoto, Aline Mizusaki; Duquette-Laplante, Fauve; Perrier, Marie-France; Dorion, Michelle; Franco, Eduardo Signorini Bicas; Brosseau, Lucie; Peccin, Maria Stella

doi:10.1080/09638288.2020.1836269

Cited by 12 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 55 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We identified 7804 studies and included 28 systematic reviews18–20 22 24 34 35 37–57 (figure 1). These 28 reviews included 1467 studies comprised of 1724 interventions.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A list of the studies excluded during full-text assessment, with reasons, is provided in online supplemental appendix 5. Ten reviews only used CERT,35 38 41 42 44 48 52–54 56 11 reviews only used TIDieR,18–20 24 39 45–47 50 51 55 and 6 reviews22 34 37 40 43 57 used both CERT and TIDieR (table 2). One review38 used a hybrid tool comprised of items 1–5, 7, and 9–12 from TIDieR, complemented and expanded upon by items 6 and 8 of CERT.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The median number of interventions included in the reviews was 24 (range 3–287, IQR 67). Twelve reviews assessed quality of reporting in musculoskeletal conditions,19 34 35 37 38 40–42 45 48 56 57 four in neurological conditions,39 47 51 53 six in cardiovascular conditions,18 20 22 24 49 55 one in cancer50 and five in ‘other’ conditions including urinary dysfunction (n=1),44 pelvic organ prolapse (n=1)43 organ transplant patients (n=2),46 52 and older adults (n=1) 54. See table 2 for all characteristics of included reviews.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

If exercise is medicine, why don’t we know the dose? An overview of systematic reviews assessing reporting quality of exercise interventions in health and disease

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo determine how well exercise interventions are reported in trials in health and disease.DesignOverview of systematic reviews.Data sourcesPubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus and PsycINFO from inception until June 2021.Eligibility criteriaReviews of any health condition were included if they primarily assessed quality of exercise intervention reporting using the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) or the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR). We assessed review quality using a modified version of A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews.ResultsWe identified 7804 studies and included 28 systematic reviews. The median (IQR) percentage of CERT and TIDieR items appropriately reported was 24% (19%) and 49% (33%), respectively. TIDieR items 1, Brief name (median=100%, IQR 4) and 2, Why (median=98%, IQR 6), as well as CERT item 4, Supervision and delivery (median=68%, IQR 89), were the best reported. For replication of exercise interventions, TIDieR item 8, When and how much, was moderately well reported (median=62%, IQR 68) although CERT item 8, Description of each exercise to enable replication (median=23%, IQR 44) and item 13, Detailed description of the exercise intervention (median=24%, IQR 66) were poorly reported. Quality of systematic reviews ranged from moderate to critically low quality.ConclusionExercise interventions are poorly reported across a range of health conditions. If exercise is medicine, then how it is prescribed and delivered is unclear, potentially limiting its translation from research to practice.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021261285; Open Science Framework: osf.io/my3ec/.

show abstract

“…We identified 7804 studies and included 28 systematic reviews18–20 22 24 34 35 37–57 (figure 1). These 28 reviews included 1467 studies comprised of 1724 interventions.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

If exercise is medicine, why don’t we know the dose? An overview of systematic reviews assessing reporting quality of exercise interventions in health and disease

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…LBP is de ned as pain in the back from the level of the lowest rib down to the gluteal fold with a lifetime prevalence of 84% [19] . It is pragmatically classi ed as either nonspeci c or speci c by the German National Disease Management Guideline [20] , and residual LBP after surgery is often considered nonspeci c pain because there are no clear causal relationships among the symptoms, orthopaedic physical examination and imaging ndings in most cases.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Correlation Among Residual Pain, Spinopelvic Parameters and Area of Fat Infiltration in Lumbar Multifidus Muscles in Patients after Lumbar Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Zhong¹,

Ding²,

Fu³

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Numerous studies have reported that pelvic functional training is beneficial for improving low back pain (LBP) in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH) after lumbar surgery and that fat infiltration of the lumbar multifidus muscles (LMMs) is one of the most important reasons for residual LBP after surgery. However, little is known about the exact relationship among residual LBP, spinopelvic parameters and the area of fat infiltration in LMM after lumbar surgery. This study aimed to confirm the relationship among residual LBP, spinopelvic parameters and the area of fat infiltration in LMM and to investigate why pelvic functional training can relieve pain symptoms in patients with LDH after lumbar surgery.Methods: One hundred forty-three patients with LDH were involved in this study. Clinical data were collected from a system of digital medical records, including age, gender, course, and weight. On the MRI images, the cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of bilateral fat infiltration in the LMM were measured using a picture archiving and communication system (PACS). On the X-ray, sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT) and pelvic incidence (PI) were also measured by PACS. Pearson correlation analysis was applied to analyse the differences between CSA of fat infiltration in LMM and spinopelvic parameters, and ROC curves were used to reflect the degree of fat infiltration in LMM with spinopelvic parameters.Results: One hundred and twenty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. SS and PI were positively correlated with CSA of fat infiltration in LMM at L3-4 and L4-5 (p < 0.01). At L4-5, SS and PI demonstrated significant positive correlation with the CSA of fat infiltration in the LMM (0.5 < | r | < 0.8). PI also exhibited a significant positive correlation with VAS (0.5 < | r | < 0.8), but SS had a low correlation with VAS (0.3 < | r | < 0.5). At L4-5, only the PI had a significant ROC curve (AUC = 0.836) with a cut-off point score of 0.556 and sensitivity and specificity values of 62.8% and 87.4%, respectively. However, at L3-4 and L5-S1, the AUCs of the ROC curves were all < 0.7 for SS, PT and PI. Conclusions: The wider pelvic anterior tilt, the more severe fat the infiltration in LMM. Residual LBP can be relieved by spinopelvic correction training potentially due to the improvement of fat infiltration in LMM.

show abstract

“…The therapeutic approach to LBP is challenging in decision making for its wide variety of causes and symptoms. The first-line approach includes nonpharmacological treatments (eg, self-management advice and education, exercise therapy, 6,7 psychosocial interventions, and manual therapy) and pharmacological interventions as analgesics and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. 8 In the absence of significant neurological compromise and cardiovascular contraindications, physical therapy, stretching, and regular aerobic exercise are always encouraged.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Active, Targeted, and Measured Device-Based Therapy for Low Back Pain With the David Spine Concept

Langella

Edoardo²,

Basso³

et al. 2021

Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background:The David Spine Concept (DSC) device-based physical therapy for low back pain involves the quantitative assessment of lumbar muscle strength and range of motion. The study aims to determine the effectiveness of the DSC device-based therapy for low back pain. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, clinical data of 103 patients who underwent DSC device-based physiotherapy were reviewed. Pre-and posttreatment outcome measures for pain and disability were assessed. Results: Our results showed statistically significant improvement in terms of disability, pain, and functional status after physiotherapy. Conclusion:The DSC device-based therapy effectively relieved pain, improved function, and reduced disability in patients with low back pain.

show abstract

The management of lower back pain using pilates method: assessment of content exercise reporting in RCTs

Cited by 12 publications

References 55 publications

If exercise is medicine, why don’t we know the dose? An overview of systematic reviews assessing reporting quality of exercise interventions in health and disease

If exercise is medicine, why don’t we know the dose? An overview of systematic reviews assessing reporting quality of exercise interventions in health and disease

Correlation Among Residual Pain, Spinopelvic Parameters and Area of Fat Infiltration in Lumbar Multifidus Muscles in Patients after Lumbar Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Active, Targeted, and Measured Device-Based Therapy for Low Back Pain With the David Spine Concept

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

The management of lower back pain using pilates method: assessment of content exercise reporting in RCTs

Cited by 12 publications

References 55 publications

If exercise is medicine, why don’t we know the dose? An overview of systematic reviews assessing reporting quality of exercise interventions in health and disease

If exercise is medicine, why don’t we know the dose? An overview of systematic reviews assessing reporting quality of exercise interventions in health and disease

Correlation Among Residual Pain, Spinopelvic&nbsp;Parameters and Area of Fat Infiltration in Lumbar Multifidus Muscles in Patients after Lumbar Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Active, Targeted, and Measured Device-Based Therapy for Low Back Pain With the David Spine Concept

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About

Correlation Among Residual Pain, Spinopelvic Parameters and Area of Fat Infiltration in Lumbar Multifidus Muscles in Patients after Lumbar Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study.