2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12671-016-0578-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Long-Term Effects of Mindfulness Added to Family Resilience-Oriented Couples Support Group on Psychological Well-Being and Cortisol Responses in Breast Cancer Survivors and Their Partners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall percentage of female participants was 69.3%. The studies’ interventions were grouped into the following 6 categories: mindfulness 15 -23 (9 studies, k = 11), psychotherapy 4,24 -30 (8), narrative 31 -37 (7), psychoeducational 38 -42 (5), prosocial 43,44 (2), and spiritual reminiscence 45,46 (2). Forty-two percent of the studies used active control groups, with the rest utilizing passive or waitlist controls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall percentage of female participants was 69.3%. The studies’ interventions were grouped into the following 6 categories: mindfulness 15 -23 (9 studies, k = 11), psychotherapy 4,24 -30 (8), narrative 31 -37 (7), psychoeducational 38 -42 (5), prosocial 43,44 (2), and spiritual reminiscence 45,46 (2). Forty-two percent of the studies used active control groups, with the rest utilizing passive or waitlist controls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four intervention categories had studies with both active and passive control groups. The mindfulness studies with active control groups 16,18,20,21 ( k = 5) had an average effect size (SMD) = 0.165 (CI –0.175 to 0.506), Q = 13.9 (p < .001), while the mindfulness studies with a passive control group 15,17,19,22,23 ( k = 6) had an average effect size (SMD) = 1.565 (CI 0.435 to 2.70), Q = 79.8 (p < .0001). The psychoeducational study with an active control group 38 had an average effect size (SMD) = 0.181 (CI –0.399 to 0.760) Q = 0.0 (p < .0001), the psychoeducational studies with passive control groups 39 -42 (4) had an average effect size (SMD) = 0.829 (CI 0.052 to 1.606), Q = 36.6 (p < .0001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the characteristics of the studies see Table 2. Nineteen of these studies utilized a meditation program based on mindfulness and used focused attention (FA) type meditation, while one used mind-body (M-B) (Hsiao et al, 2016) and the other study a body-mind (B-M) intervention (Fan et al, 2013). Only five studies (24%) took saliva samples on more days: one of them sampled one per day, while two sampled four and another two on five occasions during the day.…”
Section: Effect Of Meditation On Salivary Cortisolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no effects of gender distribution, the age of the participants or the total time of the intervention. In case of the elapsed time after the intervention we excluded one study (Hsiao et al, 2016) because it was an outlier in this regard (the latest sampling was after one year). The effect was non-significant (see Table 6 and Figure 6).…”
Section: Effect Of Meditation On Salivary Cortisolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation