2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2006.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The logic of tied implications, part 2: Syntax

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We devote the second part of this work [69] to syntax. There, we construct a predicate calculus for prelinear tied adjointness algebras.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We devote the second part of this work [69] to syntax. There, we construct a predicate calculus for prelinear tied adjointness algebras.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This way, duality works to establish some new inferences from their duals, without new proofs. This duality principle will be made precise, within syntax, in Part 2 [69]. As this particular duality is based upon reversing the order of L and keeping the order of P, its formulation would have been impossible if L had to be indiscernible from P.…”
Section: K(k(a Y) Y) A(a H (X Y)) H (H (X Y) Z)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relationship between the operations ↑ and ↓ is in fact an instance of Morsi's duality[55] combined with the inversion duality (i.e., the duality between R and R −1 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%