The Lobules of the Mammalian Cerebellum and Cerebellar Nomenclature

Three-Dimensional MRI Atlas of the Human Cerebellum in Proportional Stereotaxic Space

“…An additional consideration that limits the useful-ness of available atlases is that the terminology used to identify the fissures and lobules is not uniform and is often contradictory. There have been many revisions of the nomenclature of cerebellum of both human and monkey through the years (Malacarne, 1776;Vicq d' Azyr, 1786;Meckel, 1838;His, 1895;Stroud, 1895;Flatau and Jacobsohn, 1899;Dejerine, 1901;Smith, 1902;Bradley, 1904;Bolk, 1906;Edinger, 1909;Ingvar, 1918Ingvar, , 1928Langelaan, 1919;Jakob, 1928;Riley, 1929Riley, , 1930Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 1933;Ziehen, 1934;Ariëns Kappers et al, 1936;Dow, 1942;Loyning and Jansen, 1955;International Anatomical Nomenclature Committee, 1956;Jansen and Brodal, 1958;Larsell 1934Larsell , 1937Larsell , 1947Larsell , 1953Larsell , 1958Larsell , 1962Larsell , 1970Larsell and Jansen, 1972). The number of attempts to understand the gross morphologic organiza- tion of the cerebellum reflects the difficulty of the task.…”

Three-Dimensional MRI Atlas of the Human Cerebellum in Proportional Stereotaxic Space

“…An additional consideration that limits the useful-ness of available atlases is that the terminology used to identify the fissures and lobules is not uniform and is often contradictory. There have been many revisions of the nomenclature of cerebellum of both human and monkey through the years (Malacarne, 1776;Vicq d' Azyr, 1786;Meckel, 1838;His, 1895;Stroud, 1895;Flatau and Jacobsohn, 1899;Dejerine, 1901;Smith, 1902;Bradley, 1904;Bolk, 1906;Edinger, 1909;Ingvar, 1918Ingvar, , 1928Langelaan, 1919;Jakob, 1928;Riley, 1929Riley, , 1930Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 1933;Ziehen, 1934;Ariëns Kappers et al, 1936;Dow, 1942;Loyning and Jansen, 1955;International Anatomical Nomenclature Committee, 1956;Jansen and Brodal, 1958;Larsell 1934Larsell , 1937Larsell , 1947Larsell , 1953Larsell , 1958Larsell , 1962Larsell , 1970Larsell and Jansen, 1972). The number of attempts to understand the gross morphologic organiza- tion of the cerebellum reflects the difficulty of the task.…”

The projection of the forebrain on the pons and cerebellum

“…The essential difference between the classifications of Elliot Smith and Ingvar lies in the fact that the former author considered the pyramid part of the lobus medius, the latter part of the lobus posterius. More recently Riley (1930) has reverted to the division of the cerebellum into anterior and posterior lobes separated by the fissura prima. In the present investigation it has been found necessary to adopt the primary subdivisions of Bolk and Riley.…”

Three-Dimensional MRI Atlas of the Human Cerebellum in Proportional Stereotaxic Space

“…An additional consideration that limits the useful-ness of available atlases is that the terminology used to identify the fissures and lobules is not uniform and is often contradictory. There have been many revisions of the nomenclature of cerebellum of both human and monkey through the years (Malacarne, 1776;Vicq d' Azyr, 1786;Meckel, 1838;His, 1895;Stroud, 1895;Flatau and Jacobsohn, 1899;Dejerine, 1901;Smith, 1902;Bradley, 1904;Bolk, 1906;Edinger, 1909;Ingvar, 1918Ingvar, , 1928Langelaan, 1919;Jakob, 1928;Riley, 1929Riley, , 1930Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 1933;Ziehen, 1934;Ariëns Kappers et al, 1936;Dow, 1942;Loyning and Jansen, 1955;International Anatomical Nomenclature Committee, 1956;Jansen and Brodal, 1958;Larsell 1934Larsell , 1937Larsell , 1947Larsell , 1953Larsell , 1958Larsell , 1962Larsell , 1970Larsell and Jansen, 1972). The number of attempts to understand the gross morphologic organiza- tion of the cerebellum reflects the difficulty of the task.…”

The projection of the forebrain on the pons and cerebellum

“…The essential difference between the classifications of Elliot Smith and Ingvar lies in the fact that the former author considered the pyramid part of the lobus medius, the latter part of the lobus posterius. More recently Riley (1930) has reverted to the division of the cerebellum into anterior and posterior lobes separated by the fissura prima. In the present investigation it has been found necessary to adopt the primary subdivisions of Bolk and Riley.…”

Three-Dimensional MRI Atlas of the Human Cerebellum in Proportional Stereotaxic Space

“…An additional consideration that limits the useful-ness of available atlases is that the terminology used to identify the fissures and lobules is not uniform and is often contradictory. There have been many revisions of the nomenclature of cerebellum of both human and monkey through the years (Malacarne, 1776;Vicq d' Azyr, 1786;Meckel, 1838;His, 1895;Stroud, 1895;Flatau and Jacobsohn, 1899;Dejerine, 1901;Smith, 1902;Bradley, 1904;Bolk, 1906;Edinger, 1909;Ingvar, 1918Ingvar, , 1928Langelaan, 1919;Jakob, 1928;Riley, 1929Riley, , 1930Anatomical Society of Great Britain and Ireland, 1933;Ziehen, 1934;Ariëns Kappers et al, 1936;Dow, 1942;Loyning and Jansen, 1955;International Anatomical Nomenclature Committee, 1956;Jansen and Brodal, 1958;Larsell 1934Larsell , 1937Larsell , 1947Larsell , 1953Larsell , 1958Larsell , 1962Larsell , 1970Larsell and Jansen, 1972). The number of attempts to understand the gross morphologic organiza- tion of the cerebellum reflects the difficulty of the task.…”

The projection of the forebrain on the pons and cerebellum

“…The essential difference between the classifications of Elliot Smith and Ingvar lies in the fact that the former author considered the pyramid part of the lobus medius, the latter part of the lobus posterius. More recently Riley (1930) has reverted to the division of the cerebellum into anterior and posterior lobes separated by the fissura prima. In the present investigation it has been found necessary to adopt the primary subdivisions of Bolk and Riley.…”