2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Linder hypothesis during the globalization era

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, Trade agreements, Language similarities, contiguity, and colonial links enhance trade, while the dissimilarity in demand structures (i.e., LINDijt$$ LIN{D}_{ijt} $$), geographic distance, and landlockedness dampen international trade. These coefficients align with the existing literature (Anderson & Yotov, 2020; Bailey et al, 2021; Donaubauer et al, 2018; Fauceglia et al, 2018; Heid et al, 2021; Helble & Majoe, 2020; Kitenge, 2021; Ngepah & Udeagha, 2018; Nguyen, 2019; Santos Silva & Tenreyro, 2006; Yotov et al, 2016). Table 3A.1 also reveals negative interactions between colonial linkages and contiguity but positive interactions between landlockedness and contiguity and between landlockedness and colonial links in impacting international trade.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, Trade agreements, Language similarities, contiguity, and colonial links enhance trade, while the dissimilarity in demand structures (i.e., LINDijt$$ LIN{D}_{ijt} $$), geographic distance, and landlockedness dampen international trade. These coefficients align with the existing literature (Anderson & Yotov, 2020; Bailey et al, 2021; Donaubauer et al, 2018; Fauceglia et al, 2018; Heid et al, 2021; Helble & Majoe, 2020; Kitenge, 2021; Ngepah & Udeagha, 2018; Nguyen, 2019; Santos Silva & Tenreyro, 2006; Yotov et al, 2016). Table 3A.1 also reveals negative interactions between colonial linkages and contiguity but positive interactions between landlockedness and contiguity and between landlockedness and colonial links in impacting international trade.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The estimates were likely to be higher in studies using recent periods. Yotov (2012) and Kitenge (2021) observed over-time variations in trade elasticities due to globalization; Alessandria et al (2020) showed that dynamic behaviors of exporting firms could be responsible for variations in trade elasticities over time, and Anderson and Yotov (2016) found variations in estimates depending on the presence or absence of time-varying variables such as the volume of trade leading to scale effects. According to Kitenge and Lahiri (2022), a higher ability to translate different languages could reduce the importance of language similarities in international trade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%