2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1611810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Limits of Nonprofit Impact: A Contingency Framework for Measuring Social Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
178
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
178
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Welfare economics and the large range of bespoke social impact measurement approaches developed within the not-for-profit or social entrepreneurship sectors offer a set of models that can be used in different contexts, but no dominant standard has emerged (Mulgan, 2010;Ebrahim and Rangan, 2010). As a consequence, exploring the comparative performance of social innovation remains a challenge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Welfare economics and the large range of bespoke social impact measurement approaches developed within the not-for-profit or social entrepreneurship sectors offer a set of models that can be used in different contexts, but no dominant standard has emerged (Mulgan, 2010;Ebrahim and Rangan, 2010). As a consequence, exploring the comparative performance of social innovation remains a challenge.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an INGO that is providing earthquake relief in Haiti, change is relatively easily measured by counting the delivery of emergency supplies and the number of people assisted. As Ebrahim and Rangan ( [94], p. 19) write, even though providing emergency relief in the immediate aftermath of a disaster "is a complex activity, requiring highly sophisticated coordination and supply chain management capabilities," it focuses on meeting survival needs rather than longer-term changes and is therefore possible to quantify the change that such an INGO delivers. Similarly, if an INGO engages in post-emergency community development in Haiti and provides services such as access to education and health care to all children below the age of five, then defining, tracking and reporting on progress to donors, although resource intensive, is doable.…”
Section: Proposition Development: Christian Faith-related Ingos and Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most evaluations are concerned with second generation level evaluation (Guba and Lincoln, 1986), that is, measuring performance against program objectives, without consideration of the wider ramifications of the program. The majority of evaluations are limited to measures of outputs and lower order outcomes (Thomson 2010;Ebrahim and Rangan 2010). They focus on specific programs and not the organisation as a whole.…”
Section: Evaluation and Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%