2011
DOI: 10.3176/earth.2011.4.04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The LiDAR-based topo-hydrological modelling of the Nigula mire, SW Estonia

Abstract: There was no big influence of the used cell scales and algorithms on the mean topographical properties of the Nigula mire digital elevation models (DEMs). The DEMs, generated using the Triangulated Irregular Network and Inverse Distance Weighted algorithms, revealed the closest mire surface properties from all used generation algorithms. The subtracted MAX–MIN DEMs layer revealed a well visible net of ditches and possible plant cover pattern differentiated in vertical scale. In the Nigula mire 58% of the mire … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…p values are corrected followingBenjamini and Hochberg (1995). The error bars represent standard errors, and the numbers in the bars are the number of replicates per micrositeOur results demonstrate that digital photogrammetry is an accurate way to derive high-resolution digital elevation models for peatlands, and thereby a cost-effective alternative for airborne light detection and ranging campaigns(Korpela, Koskinen, Vasander, Holopainen, & Minkkinen, 2009;Lode & Leivits, 2011). The median vertical difference between manual and photogrammetrically derived peat surface elevation was 0.0026 m in this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…p values are corrected followingBenjamini and Hochberg (1995). The error bars represent standard errors, and the numbers in the bars are the number of replicates per micrositeOur results demonstrate that digital photogrammetry is an accurate way to derive high-resolution digital elevation models for peatlands, and thereby a cost-effective alternative for airborne light detection and ranging campaigns(Korpela, Koskinen, Vasander, Holopainen, & Minkkinen, 2009;Lode & Leivits, 2011). The median vertical difference between manual and photogrammetrically derived peat surface elevation was 0.0026 m in this study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 51%
“…(a) Mean peat volume change per microsite between 13 May to 12 July and (b) mean water table relative to peat surface per microsite. The error bars represent standard errors, and the numbers in the bars are the number of replicates per microsite Our results demonstrate that digital photogrammetry is an accurate way to derive high-resolution digital elevation models for peatlands, and thereby a cost-effective alternative for airborne light detection and ranging campaigns(Korpela, Koskinen, Vasander, Holopainen, & Minkkinen, 2009;Lode & Leivits, 2011). p values are corrected followingBenjamini and Hochberg (1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The proper groundwater level and fluctuations in peat bog models in the research literature [39] are determined by relief and micro-landforms in the local area [40]. Under natural conditions, fluctuations in groundwater levels are rather low throughout the year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaporation and transpiration are calculated as one mass flow in 3PG, which can cause simulated evapotranspiration and thus SW to significantly deviate from real conditions, especially when the stand is thinned or a clear-cut [22,23]. Therefore, in order to achieve a better simulation of SW prediction that is more sensitive to stand management applications, a separated calculation of soil evaporation is necessary [24,25]. The van-Genuchten-Mualem model (VGM) is the most used soil parametrization for water flow modelling in porous media and is flexible in application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%