The Landscape of Science Communication in Contemporary Canada: A Focus on Anglophone Actors and Networks

Abstract

The landscape of contemporary media presents challenges and opportunities for science writers and communicators. These issues have not yet been fully understood. This paper presents the findings of collaborative work conducted to identify the growth in numbers of social media communicators who are writing about science for the Canadian public. We used emerging media research tools, including Altmetrics, and traditional survey tools. Our goal was to help Canada's professional member associations—Science Writers and Communicators of Canada (SWCC) and the Association des Communicateurs Scientifiques du Québec (ACS)— map the changing science communication landscape in Canada. Using an online survey tool, we compared survey responses from social media science communicators we identified to those of professional science communication members of SWCC and the ACS. We found that Canadian social media science communicators were younger, were paid less (or not at all) for their science communication activities, and had been communicating science for fewer years than other science communicators. They were more likely to have a science background (rather than communication, journalism or education) and were less likely to be members of professional associations. They tended to communicate with one another through their own informal networks. These findings provide professional science communication organizations in Canada with an empirical base from which to develop training, support and outreach activities aimed at improving the quality of public engagement with science in Canada.

Science communication skills as an asset across disciplines: A 10-year case study of students’ motivation patterns at Université Laval

“…The gender patterns we observe are also consistent with the literature, with women being predominant in the field ( Riedlinger et al, 2019 ). A feminization trend became visible in the 1980s ( Lewenstein, 2019 ; Pérez-Bustos, 2019 ).…”

Profiles, Challenges, and Motivations of Science YouTubers

“…The psychological strain of being constantly online, exposed on video, and acting responsive to all sorts of comments online also appeared as a challenge in communicating science on YouTube. On Instagram and Twitter, however, Riedlinger et al (2019) have reported a majority of women science communicators, which suggests that maybe the exposition created by the medium is a relevant factor for women who choose to communicate science.…”

“…Correspondingly, sociological studies exploring the range of online-active science communicators have included more and more actors. If in earlier times the online communicative activities of scientists, postgraduates and science journalists were the main focus (Bonetta, 2007), today the literature started to contemplate new actors and organizations, such as online citizen science hubs and amateur communicators active in blogs and on social media (Acatech, 2017;Riedlinger et al, 2019).…”

Science communication to empower women in science: The case of Brazil

“…They mentioned that partnerships with male colleagues have helped them reach new audiences. However, on other social media, such as Instagram and Twitter, most science communicators are women (Riedlinger et al, 2019), perhaps indicating that these platforms constitute a better environment for women to communicate science.…”