2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3495(00)76779-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Kinetic and Physical Basis of KATP Channel Gating: Toward a Unified Molecular Understanding

Abstract: K(ATP) channels can be formed from Kir6.2 subunits with or without SUR1. The open-state stability of K(ATP) channels can be increased or reduced by mutations throughout the Kir6.2 subunit, and is increased by application of PIP(2) to the cytoplasmic membrane. Increase of open-state stability is manifested as an increase in the channel open probability in the absence of ATP (Po(zero)) and a correlated decrease in sensitivity to inhibition by ATP. Single channel lifetime analyses were performed on wild-type and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

27
250
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
27
250
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to nucleoside diphosphates, ATP does not affect burst duration, but solely increases the average time spent in interburst closed states (27,28), suggesting exclusive binding to these states. E23K-induced reduction of the time spent in interburst closure should thus lower the amount of bound ATP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In contrast to nucleoside diphosphates, ATP does not affect burst duration, but solely increases the average time spent in interburst closed states (27,28), suggesting exclusive binding to these states. E23K-induced reduction of the time spent in interburst closure should thus lower the amount of bound ATP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Thus, the P O (0) of homomeric channels containing the R201C mutation was not significantly different from wild-type, whereas that of homQ52R and homV59G channels was substantially greater (Table 1). It is well documented that an increase in P O (0) reduces the ability of ATP to close the K ATP channel (30,31). Thus, mutations at residue 201, which lies within the putative ATP-binding site (8), probably act by reducing ATP binding per se, whereas the Q52R and V59G mutations appear to decrease ATP sensitivity indirectly, by favoring the open conformation of the channel.…”
Section: Pearson and A T Hattersley Personal Communication)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, ATP and PIP 2 might bind to overlapping sites, and secondly, PIP 2 modulates ATP inhibition allosterically by interaction with basic residues in regions that are critical for the gating mechanism that links ATP binding to channel closure. Both alternatives have been put forward recently (27)(28)(29). As an argument against physically overlapping binding sites it has been pointed out that mutations in the C terminus that affected PIP 2 binding in the most cases did not change ATP inhibition (19).…”
Section: Arg-54 In the N Terminus Of Kir62 Is A Major Determinant Fomentioning
confidence: 99%