2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jri.2016.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “killer cell story” in recurrent miscarriage: Association between activated peripheral lymphocytes and uterine natural killer cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
34
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We interpret the increased numbers as an indication of an activated immune system in RM patients, showing up-regulation of immunostimulatory as well as immunoregulatory components. The observation of an up-regulated immune system in RM patients is in line with our previous publications, in which we showed that RM patients have increased absolute numbers of activated CD4 1 and CD8 1 T lymphocytes and NK cells expressing CD16 and/or CD56 [24,25]. In the present study, RM patients showed, in addition, increased absolute numbers of NK cell subsets expressing inhibitory CD158a, CD158b, CD158e and/or NKG2A receptors and/or stimulating NKG2D determinants on the cell surface.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…We interpret the increased numbers as an indication of an activated immune system in RM patients, showing up-regulation of immunostimulatory as well as immunoregulatory components. The observation of an up-regulated immune system in RM patients is in line with our previous publications, in which we showed that RM patients have increased absolute numbers of activated CD4 1 and CD8 1 T lymphocytes and NK cells expressing CD16 and/or CD56 [24,25]. In the present study, RM patients showed, in addition, increased absolute numbers of NK cell subsets expressing inhibitory CD158a, CD158b, CD158e and/or NKG2A receptors and/or stimulating NKG2D determinants on the cell surface.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…A recent meta‐analysis showed no significant difference of uNK cells between RM patients and controls . In fact, we previously also reported no difference of uNK cells between various subgroups of RM (eg primary vs. secondary RM) . However, compared to healthy controls, this study shows significantly higher levels of uNK cells in a well‐defined cohort of iRM patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…Most of the studies support the concept that in uRPL, the pregnancy-promoting functions of uNK are dysregulated in several ways. Indeed, in women with uRPL, higher concentrations of uNK have been detected than in normal fertile controls [92,[126][127][128][129][130][131], even though this finding has not always been consistent [132]. In other studies, despite no differences in the proportion of endometrial NK cells between controls and women with RPL, women with RPL have a significant decrease in the CD16 − CD56 bright NK cell subset, that is normally found in uncomplicated pregnancies [133]; this suggests that uNK cells in women with uRPL are quantitatively and qualitatively different from those normally found.…”
Section: Unksmentioning
confidence: 99%